From: Gary Duncanson (gary.duncanson@googlemail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 22 2007 - 21:19:18 ART
Hi Michael,
I can't speak for the lab grading but from what you have outlined this
shouldn't be problem and you shouldn't be penalised. Not sure why you have
astrixed out the 'no sync' part.
HTH
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Stewart" <mstewart350@gmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 9:52 PM
Subject: Cisco Assessor Help
> Hello Experts,
>
> I took my first Cisco Assessor Lab this morning, and am pretty excited
> about
> the results! It is a good eye-opener on how tasks are graded, and how
> points
> are assigned.
>
> I did have one issue with a solution regarding BGP and next-hop-self.
> Instead of using this on a neighbor command, I just inserted a "set ip
> next-hop peer-address" into the route-map which was needed for another
> task
> (dealing with setting MED out to this same neighbor). The only constraint
> on
> the task was to accomplish this by not re-configuring any other router.
>
> My question is whether or not this would get marked wrong in the real lab
> also...?
> During my studying with vendor WBs, I would always assume if you get the
> same results, the solution is ok. Now my eyes are opened to the fact that
> scripts do not always check every answer!
>
> I think I read/heard that if you are within a certain range of 80% (3 pts
> or
> so), your lab gets manually checked... is that correct? If so, what
> happens
> if there are 2 or 3 task solutions which the script does not account for,
> and you get pushed out of this range. I assume you pay the re-grade if you
> feel like you really did enough to pass!
>
>
> A follow-up question to the group is to whether or not my answer, is
> indeed,
> correct?
>
> Here is the answer per the Assessor:
>
> router bgp 1
> *neighbor 100.1.65.6 next-hop-self
> * no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 100.1.1.1 remote-as 1
> neighbor 100.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 100.1.65.6 remote-as 2
> neighbor 100.1.65.6 route-map TO_R6 out
> no auto-summary
> !
> !
> !
> route-map TO_R6 permit 10
> set metric 500
> !
>
>
>
> Here is my answer:
>
> router bgp 1
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 100.1.1.1 remote-as 1
> neighbor 100.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 100.1.65.6 remote-as 2
> neighbor 100.1.65.6 route-map TO_R6 out
> no auto-summary
> !
> !
> !
> route-map TO_R6 permit 10
> set metric 500
> set ip next-hop peer-address
>
>
> Any/all input is welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:31 ARST