From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Dec 22 2007 - 22:09:01 ART
A proctor looks at every lab no matter what the score. Also keep in mind
that the Accessor Lab is graded by a 3rd party and not Cisco.
Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>----- Original Message -----
Subject: Cisco Assessor Help
Date: Sat, December 22, 2007 13:52
From: "Michael Stewart" <mstewart350@gmail.com>
> Hello Experts,
>
> I took my first Cisco Assessor Lab this morning, and am pretty excited
about
> the results! It is a good eye-opener on how tasks are graded, and how
points
> are assigned.
>
> I did have one issue with a solution regarding BGP and next-hop-self.
> Instead of using this on a neighbor command, I just inserted a "set ip
> next-hop peer-address" into the route-map which was needed for another task
> (dealing with setting MED out to this same neighbor). The only
constraint on
> the task was to accomplish this by not re-configuring any other router.
>
> My question is whether or not this would get marked wrong in the real lab
> also...?
> During my studying with vendor WBs, I would always assume if you get the
> same results, the solution is ok. Now my eyes are opened to the fact that
> scripts do not always check every answer!
>
> I think I read/heard that if you are within a certain range of 80% (3
pts or
> so), your lab gets manually checked... is that correct? If so, what happens
> if there are 2 or 3 task solutions which the script does not account for,
> and you get pushed out of this range. I assume you pay the re-grade if you
> feel like you really did enough to pass!
>
>
> A follow-up question to the group is to whether or not my answer, is
indeed,
> correct?
>
> Here is the answer per the Assessor:
>
> router bgp 1
> *neighbor 100.1.65.6 next-hop-self
> * no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 100.1.1.1 remote-as 1
> neighbor 100.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 100.1.65.6 remote-as 2
> neighbor 100.1.65.6 route-map TO_R6 out
> no auto-summary
> !
> !
> !
> route-map TO_R6 permit 10
> set metric 500
> !
>
>
>
> Here is my answer:
>
> router bgp 1
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 100.1.1.1 remote-as 1
> neighbor 100.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 100.1.65.6 remote-as 2
> neighbor 100.1.65.6 route-map TO_R6 out
> no auto-summary
> !
> !
> !
> route-map TO_R6 permit 10
> set metric 500
> set ip next-hop peer-address
>
>
> Any/all input is welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:31 ARST