From: shiran guez (shiranp3@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2007 - 12:57:11 ART
I am sorry , I wrote it and taught on something else it is all the interface
with match network statements under the eigrp not ospf will be redistributed
automatically to eigrp protocol AS.
On Dec 18, 2007 5:36 PM, shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok, another pre-explanation when redistributing from one protocol to
> another like in your example ospf into eigrp all the connected interfaces
> that have a match network statement under your router ospf process will be
> redistributed into eigrp automatically without the redistribute connected,
> but if you also adding explicit redistribute connected it will brake that
> rule and redistribute only the specified prefix's under that redistribution.
>
>
> and now to answer your specific question, no it will not prevent ospf to
> advertise that interface in the ospf domain only in the eigrp.
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2007 5:25 PM, Suryakant P <suryakant.pandian@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Shiran,
> >
> > Thanks for the explanation.
> >
> > Here there were no two redistribution statements of the same routing
> > process.The scenario was as follows
> >
> > router eigrp 100
> > redistribute connected metric 100000 100 255 1 1500 route-map test
> > redistribute ospf 1 metric 100000 100 255 1 1500
> >
> > In the above the case ,if the route-map applied with the connected
> > redistribution statement prevents one network from being redistributed into
> > the Eigrp,does it prevent OSPF also from advertising the same network though
> > OSPF runs on that prefix.
> >
> > With regards
> > Suryakant
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/18/07, shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > please see that the logic of redistribution is from one protocol to
> > > another
> > > and there cant be 2 redistribution statement of the same protocol
> > > process into one protocol process.
> > >
> > > also on the same router you cant redistribute from one process to
> > > another
> > > only on each separate process to redistribute the protocol you want
> > >
> > > Another very important note that the redistribution happen from the
> > > routing
> > > table and not from the Protocol Database and there cant be 2 same
> > > exact
> > > prefix's in the routing table from different routing process.
> > >
> > > Also the Route Prefix is normally advertised under one protocol so
> > > with all
> > > that basics you should understand that there is no importance in the
> > > order
> > > of operation in one protocol process.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 18, 2007 4:21 PM, Nambi Appachigounder < nambi_gct@yahoo.co.in>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > When we do reditribution, if we have more than one
> > > > redistribute
> > > > statements with route-maps, is there any way to force
> > > > the order of
> > > > those redistribute commands taking effect.
> > > >
> > > > How would be the contradicting networks redistributed?
> > > > For example,
> > > > if net-A is denied by route-map1 but permitted by
> > > > route-map2.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Nambi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chat on a cool, new interface. No download required. Go to
> > > > http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Shiran Guez
> > > MCSE CCNP NCE1
> > > http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Shiran Guez
> MCSE CCNP NCE1
> http://cciep3.blogspot.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
>
--Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:31 ARST