From: Tarun Pahuja (pahujat@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2007 - 18:35:39 ART
Sridhar,
Use the distance command without the access-list. If you have
access to Jeff Doyle Volume 1 second edition, the concept is explained on
page 723.
Router ospf 1
distance 80 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0
HTH,
Tarun
On 12/16/07, Sridhar Vaidyanathan <vsridhar83@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Following is a scenario, which I have asked before but couldn't find a
> suitable reply.
>
> EIGRP OSPF
> ----------R1-----------R2
> EIGRP OSPF |
> ----------R3------------|
>
> Both R1 and R3 is redistributing EIGRP routes into OSPF. R3 would load
> balance across the 2 routers to reach EIGRP routes assuming that R1 and R3
> are passing the EIGRP routes with metric-type of E2 and an equal metric.
>
> I am using DISTANCE command at R2 to match the route which should be
> preferred via R3. The route is being learned from both R1 and R3 as mutual
> redistribution has been configured between OSPF and EIGRP on both R1 and
> R3.
> I am also using the source ip address as the router-id of the R3 in the
> distance command. Below is the configuration on R2
>
> router ospf 1
> distance 80 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0 1 (Where 3.3.3.3 is the router-id of R3)
>
> access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
>
> This however, is not working. The above configuration changes the AD for
> both the routes from both R1 and R3.
>
> Please help me in understanding and solving this.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sridhar.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:31 ARST