From: Darren Johnson (dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Sat Dec 15 2007 - 10:31:38 ART
Right, I got off my lazy ass and think I have cracked this one. Please see
below:
!
hostname R2
ip accounting-list 192.168.12.254 0.0.0.0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.0
ip accounting output-packets
ip nat outside
speed auto
!
interface Serial1/0
ip address 192.168.23.2 255.255.255.0
ip accounting output-packets
ip nat inside
no fair-queue
clock rate 128000
!
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.23.3 23 192.168.12.254 23 extendable
R2#sh ip accounting
Source Destination Packets Bytes
192.168.12.254 192.168.12.1 199 50130
Accounting data age is 1
R2#sh ip nat tr
R2#sh ip nat translations
Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside global
tcp 192.168.12.254:23 192.168.23.3:23 192.168.12.1:11003
192.168.12.1:11003
tcp 192.168.12.254:23 192.168.23.3:23 --- ---
R2#
As you can see, the accounting-list command is only concerned with ip
address 192.168.12.254 with regards to accounting information. You can also
see the PAT configuration which works a charm....
Any comments?
Dazzler
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Johnson [mailto:dazza_johnson@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 15 December 2007 10:43
To: 'Mike Stout'; 'Phillip.McCollum@ins.com'
Cc: 'felixnkansah@gmail.com'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?
Do you have the answers to this one. I tried to configure NAT but couldn't
get it working :-(
Please put me out of my misery!
Dazzler
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Stout
Sent: 15 December 2007 00:23
To: Phillip.McCollum@ins.com
Cc: felixnkansah@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?
We should ask proctor what packets/bytes means.
R1#s ip flow top
SrcIf SrcIPaddress DstIf DstIPaddress Pr SrcP DstP
Bytes
Se1/0 150.1.2.2 Local 163.1.13.1 01 0000 0800
300K
1 of 1 top talkers shown. 1 of 1 flows matched.
R1#s run | b top-talker
ip flow-top-talkers
top 1
sort-by bytes
cache-timeout 120000
match source address 150.1.2.2 255.255.255.255
!
On Dec 14, 2007 1:13 PM, <Phillip.McCollum@ins.com> wrote:
> I would guess Q1 has to do with 'autocommand'. And agree that Q2 is IP
> accounting.
>
> Phillip
> http://blog.humanmodem.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Felix Nkansah
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:51 AM
> To: groupstudy
> Subject: Is this a NAT and IP Accounting Question?
>
> Hi,
>
> I need your opinion on these tasks.
>
> Three routers are connected in this way: R1 and R3 both connect to R2
>
>
> R1 has IP address of 192.168.12.1 and connects to R2 of interface IP
> 192.168.12.2
>
> R3 has IP address of 192.168.23.3 and connects to R2 of interface IP
> 192.168.23.2
>
> R1 - 192.168.12.0/24 - R2 - 192.168.23.0/24 - R3
>
>
> *Q1. The requirement is that, if R1 telnets to 192.168.12.254, it should
> result in a telnet to R3.*
> **
> *Q2. R2 should account ONLY for the number of packets/bytes sent by host
> 192.168.12.254.*
>
> What do you think? I suppose I should be able to use static NAT to solve
> Q1
> and IP accounting for Q2. But how do I use IP accounting to meet the
> 'ONLY'
> request.
>
> Regards,
>
> Felix
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST