From: Steven Hodgson (steven.hodgson@inxi.com)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2007 - 19:55:56 ART
Well I would agree with that except that the lab doesn't ask me to
advertise networks into BGP, but then it says to summarize one of my
networks in BGP (aggregate-address). It would be pretty ineffectual to
do that if I'm not already advertising my more specific networks.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Luan Nguyen
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 3:26 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IEWB - What networks to advertise in BGP?
Just like one of the gentleman said above:"Don't put anything on that
the
lab doesn't ask you to"
for route-reflector and confederation, the lab would ask you to peer
between
iBGP neighbors but not a mesh one, so that implies RR or Confederate.
I wasn't baffled by the way, I was just trying to suggest that after you
've
done with the lab, instead of wr erase and do a different one, play
around
with your config...add a network, filter different things...etc so you
could
learn more.
-lmn
On Dec 13, 2007 3:31 PM, Steven Hodgson <steven.hodgson@inxi.com> wrote:
> Anyone have an answer to this? Seems like everyone is baffled. It's
> definitely not optional that you advertise the networks because the
lab
> requires you to modify the networks advertised.
>
> > I have been working on the IEWB labs and for some reason the labs
> never
> > say
> > what networks to advertise in BGP. I assume there's a good reason
> for
> > this, but I don't know what it is. Should I advertise only the
> networks
> > for
> >
> > which I have peering or should I advertise the networks which are
> > attached
> > to interfaces included in the logical diagram as part of a BGP AS?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Steve
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:30 ARST