Re: NEED HELP...

From: itsfortarget iwillgetit (itsfortarget@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2007 - 15:00:47 ART


Someone, could you please come up , why the VLAN info still retained??

On Dec 7, 2007 8:18 PM, Alexander Belov <abelov@technoserv.ru> wrote:

> Why would it loose the vlan info after restart? ;)
>
> Somenone should kill the vlan.dat firstly....
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Joseph Saad
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 5:17 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: NEED HELP...
>
> Server and client store the vlan information in vlan.dat
> Transparent stores it in running-config and you save it in startup-config.
>
> Your clients will be OK till your restart any or all the switches.
>
> You'll lose all your vlan information on restarting a switch.
>
> Joseph.
>
> On Dec 7, 2007 6:00 PM, itsfortarget iwillgetit <itsfortarget@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Team,
> >
> > Hope all doing good.Let me narrate my doubt below....
> >
> > I have 4 switches, say SW1, SW2,SW3 and SW4.SW1 is VTP server and
> > remaining
> > are client. Now suppose all the VLAN information is synchronised between
> > Server and Client
> > and LAN is up and running smooth.Let's suppose,now the VTP mode of all
> > client changing in to Transparent mode, will this changes effect my
> users?
> > my transparent switches will retain the VLAN information obtained from
> > Server?
> >
> > Hope you all will interact.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST