RE: Shaping FR

From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Wed Dec 05 2007 - 16:45:12 ART

• Next message: Scott Vermillion: "RE: magic numbers"
• Previous message: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: RSPAN VLAN and VTP Setup"
• Maybe in reply to: wael osama: "Shaping FR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

What does show frame pvc xxx

Tell you?

-Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of wael
osama
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:21 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Shaping FR

Hi GS,

I'd like to ask if there is any functional difference between applying
shaping to the *frame relay interface/subinterface* using FRTS, MQC shaping
directly by attaching service policy to the interface or service policy in
FRTS map class

1- map-class frame-relay FRTS
    frame-relay cir 256

    interface s1/1
    frame-relay class FRTS

2- policy-map play
    class class-default
    shape average 256000

    interface s1/1
    service-policy output play

3- map-class frame-relay FRTS
    service-policy output play

    interface s1/1
    frame-relay class FRTS

thanks in advance

• Next message: Scott Vermillion: "RE: magic numbers"
• Previous message: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: RSPAN VLAN and VTP Setup"
• Maybe in reply to: wael osama: "Shaping FR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST