Shaping FR

From: wael osama (wael.study@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 05 2007 - 15:21:06 ART

• Next message: dara tomar: "Re: MPLS VRF-lite problem"
• Previous message: David Prall: "RE: MPLS VRF-lite problem"
• Next in thread: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Shaping FR"
• Maybe reply: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Shaping FR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi GS,

I'd like to ask if there is any functional difference between applying
shaping to the *frame relay interface/subinterface* using FRTS, MQC shaping
directly by attaching service policy to the interface or service policy in
FRTS map class

1- map-class frame-relay FRTS
    frame-relay cir 256

    interface s1/1
    frame-relay class FRTS

2- policy-map play
    class class-default
    shape average 256000

    interface s1/1
    service-policy output play

3- map-class frame-relay FRTS
    service-policy output play

    interface s1/1
    frame-relay class FRTS

thanks in advance

• Next message: dara tomar: "Re: MPLS VRF-lite problem"
• Previous message: David Prall: "RE: MPLS VRF-lite problem"
• Next in thread: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Shaping FR"
• Maybe reply: Joseph Brunner: "RE: Shaping FR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST