From: Scott Vermillion (scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2007 - 22:01:58 ART
It's not necessary to allow the unicasting of RIP updates between two
neighbors. However, it *is* required to prevent the
broadcasting/multicasting of updates along side of those unicasts (that is
to say, a router with only a neighbor configuration under RIP will be
sending two updates each time - one to the unicast neighbor and one to the
entire segment). So if the task has to do with preventing others from
seeing the updates, it's required...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ali.Huang
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 5:44 PM
To: Asim Zafar
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: rip
As I know there is no special relationship between them.
On 12/5/07, Asim Zafar <asim.mz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> Is it mandatory to configure passive interface to configure rip in unicast
> mode
>
> example:
>
> passive interface fas0/0
> neighbour x.x.x.x
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Asim Zafar
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- THX. Ali.huang
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST