From: Paul Cocker (paul.cocker@inbox.com)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2007 - 21:45:34 ART
Asim,
Sorry, didn't put the correct output in there.
I have this...
*Mar 1 00:11:46.167: RIP: sending v1 update to 192.168.0.2 via
FastEthernet0/0 (192.168.0.1)
*Mar 1 00:11:46.171: RIP: build update entries
*Mar 1 00:11:46.171: network 172.16.0.0 metric 1
*Mar 1 00:11:48.463: RIP: received v1 update from 192.168.0.2 on
FastEthernet0/0
*Mar 1 00:11:48.467: 10.0.0.0 in 1 hops
With this config
Rack1R1#sh ip int brief | inc up
FastEthernet0/0 192.168.0.1 YES manual up
up
Loopback1 172.16.0.1 YES manual up
up
router rip
network 172.16.0.0
network 192.168.0.0
neighbor 192.168.0.2
Which seems to show unicast updates being sent and received without having
the passive-interface command.
Regards,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Cocker [mailto:paul.cocker@inbox.com]
Sent: 05 December 2007 00:29
To: 'Asim Zafar'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: rip
Asim,
After applying the following config, and running a debug ip rip, we can see
that it works without passive-interface being applied.
Regards,
Paul
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
end
router rip
network 192.168.0.0
neighbor 192.168.0.2
Rack1R1#debug ip rip
RIP protocol debugging is on
*Mar 1 00:06:14.223: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via
FastEthernet0/0 (192.168.0.1)
*Mar 1 00:06:14.227: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
*Mar 1 00:06:14.231: RIP: sending v1 update to 192.168.0.2 via
FastEthernet0/0 (192.168.0.1)
*Mar 1 00:06:14.235: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
Rack1R1#
*Mar 1 00:06:19.091: RIP: received v1 update from 192.168.0.2 on
FastEthernet0/0
*Mar 1 00:06:19.095: 10.0.0.0 in 1 hops
*Mar 1 00:06:19.099: RIP: received v1 update from 192.168.0.2 on
FastEthernet0/0
*Mar 1 00:06:19.099: 10.0.0.0 in 1 hops
*Mar 1 00:06:19.103: RIP: received v1 update from 192.168.0.2 on
FastEthernet0/0
*Mar 1 00:06:19.107: 10.0.0.0 in 1 hops
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Asim
Zafar
Sent: 04 December 2007 23:33
To: Cisco certification
Subject: rip
Hi All,
Is it mandatory to configure passive interface to configure rip in unicast
mode
example:
passive interface fas0/0
neighbour x.x.x.x
-- Thanks & Regards,Asim Zafar
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST