From: Fernando Carvalho (fernando.cagica@t-online.de)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2007 - 15:11:04 ART
I think both will do it since you have no Layer3 separation between
client and server.
-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Im Auftrag von
Carlos Trujillo Jimenez
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. November 2007 16:19
An: wael.study@gmail.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Betreff: Re: etherchannel load balance method
Thanks Osama!
now, if we choose the destination based lod balance method in SWITCHB
(from
the server traffic towards the clients), what do you think should be the
correct destination based balancing method?
mac destination based, or ip destination based?
assuming, there is a single vlan between the clients and the server? I
think it should be mac destinatin based insted of ip destinatio based,
please tell me if Im wrong.
Thanks.
>From: "wael osama" <wael.study@gmail.com>
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Nov 2007 08:12:01.0278 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[5A78C9E0:01C83196]
>
>from the servers side you can load balance based on the destination
>address "client addresses"
>
>On Nov 28, 2007 5:21 AM, Carlos Trujillo Jimenez
><nergal888@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
> > Scenario:
> >
> >
> > HostA-------------------******************** bundle
> > ********************
> > *
> > *--------------------* *
> > HostB-------------------* SWITCH A *
*
> > SWITCH B *--------SERVER
> > *
> > *--------------------* *
> > HostC-------------------********************
> > *********************
> >
> >
> > Switch A and Switch B are both CATALYST 3560 and are linked forming
> > an etherchannel bundle together. Clients are attached to SWITCHA,
> > and the server is attached to SWITCHB.
> >
> > For choosing the best load balancing method who fits the design,
> > what is the best load balancing method for switch A as well as for
> > switch B?
> >
> > Some explanations become some confusing to me. When talking about
> > load balance according to source-mac who is the default: When switch
> > A
>recibed
> > frames destined to the server he will load balance according to the
>source
> > of each of its clients, to the etherchannel in the path to the
> > server?
>is
> > this ok?
> > what about the return path? from the server to the clients?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Consigue aqum las mejores y mas recientes ofertas de trabajo en
> > Amirica Latina y USA: http://latam.msn.com/empleos/
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > ___
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:31 ART