Re: Real CBWFQ problem

From: Henrique Reis (reis.henrique@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 26 2007 - 07:39:58 ART


Hi,

I suggest you printout a copy of "show policy int tu5014" when the problem
occur and a copy of Class-maps and tunnel configuration.

Thanks,

Reis

On 11/26/07, Serge <serge.ciscostudy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I have the following situation:
> policy-map SHAPE-OUT-DIVISION
> class WU-OUT
> bandwidth percent 5
> class MAIL-OUT
> bandwidth percent 15
> class PROXY-OUT
> bandwidth percent 5
> class HTTP-OUT
> bandwidth percent 2
> class SSH-OUT
> bandwidth percent 3
> class CYTRIX-OUT
> bandwidth percent 60
> class ALL_OTHER-OUT
> bandwidth percent 10
> policy-map GRE128-DIVISION
> class ALL
> shape average 120000
> service-policy SHAPE-OUT-DIVISION
> class class-default
>
>
> interface Tunnel5014
> description
> bandwidth 128
> service-policy output GRE128-DIVISION
>
> and my client says that when somebody sends mail (traffic goes to the
> class
> MAIL-OUT), CYTRIX users are suffering large delays. Probably, mail traffic
> gets all the bandwidth and cytrix users don't get the reserved 60 kbit. It
> seems like the priority 60 can help for the CYTRIX class, but then it will
> be policed all the time (given the condition that the bandwidth is only
> 128
> kbit, I assume that interface is congested all the time).
>
> What can we do in such a situtation?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:31 ART