Re: Unspecified Interfaces

From: EDL (r.s.cciestudy@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2007 - 02:19:21 ART


Bajo,

Thanks for replying. I wish more people would share their tips and tricks
though.

Ed

On Nov 19, 2007 4:08 AM, Bajo <bajoalex@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi R S,
>
> I would not spend any time at the beginning trying to figure out
> un-assigned interfaces.
>
> But at the end the IGP section, I would write the ping script which
> includes all interfaces (do sh ip alias and Control V and highlight
> the IP addresses ) and fire it up. If ping fails, I would make sure
> those interfaces are redistributed accordingly. Drawing your diagram
> comes in handy for this....
>
> Remember, on routers where mutual redistribution b/n two routing
> protocols are done, local interfaces are not re-distributed.
>
> Also, re-do the ping after finishing all sections ( sometime stuff
> happens especially after Security...QoS...etc). They may also tell you
> not to worry pinging some extra interfaces.
>
> Helpfully someone else will chip-in and cool tricks or corrections...etc
>
> On 11/17/07, R.S CCIE <r.s.cciestudy@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would you share with me the method you use to track down those
> interfaces(
> > i.e. loopback interfaces and/or Ethernet interfaces) were not told what
> > routing protocol should they be included in.
> >
> > I am trying to spot those unspecified interfaces ahead instead of
> finding
> > out almost at the end of the lab. Do you write down all the ip addresses
> on
> > all routers and check it off one by one.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ed
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
> --
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bajo



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:30 ART