From: darth router (darklordrouter@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Nov 19 2007 - 23:11:17 ART
I doubt Joe is crying about the hijacking. He seems like a pretty tough guy
:) Grats again on the digits Joe.
DR
On 11/19/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Nope.
>
> Joe started this thread to say he passed and to thank a few people.
> Somewhere along the lines the thread got hijacked about the usual fear
> about
> numbers.
>
> Rgds
> Gary
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <M_A_Jones@Dell.com>
> To: <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>; <darklordrouter@gmail.com>
> Cc: <joe@affirmedsystems.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 9:32 PM
> Subject: RE: CCIE 19366
>
>
> Ha!
>
> So you mean to tell me the guy who started this got his CCIE,
>
> If that's not oxymoronic!!!!
>
> Nevertheless congrats...It reminds me of the guy in college that's anti
> college, who's carrying a 4.0...to funny!!
>
>
> Michael Jones
> Network Engineer
> Global Network Operations
> Dell Inc. | Information Technology
> W. 512.723.3268 | C. 512.966.6908
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Gary Duncanson
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:45 PM
> To: darth router
> Cc: Joseph Brunner; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: CCIE 19366
>
> hehehe yeah flame on..
>
> But I got labs to do!
>
> I still don't think 20000 CCIE's is a lot in the grand scheme of things.
> Hell, I remember one time after another long day in the IT biz making a
> note to myself that numbers were rising and I better get a move on
> before we hit 20000. I made that note in 2001! It's taken six years to
> finally get close to that number!
>
> Just before we all forget, the thread was started by Joe who passed his
> CCIE.
>
> Congrats again Joe!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: darth router
> To: Gary Duncanson
> Cc: Joseph Brunner ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:29 PM
> Subject: Re: CCIE 19366
>
>
>
>
> I don't think the number game is just fear. If there is enough doubt
> of paper CCIEs on this board of all places, its out there in the market,
> and the real world. The devaluing of the certification is inevitable
> over time with mass consumption. I am not saying it will ever be like a
> CCNA. That is a bit insane, but less valuable over time depending on how
> many of us are flooding the market, you betcha. So why are so many
> people passing? Materials, dynamips, brain dumps, ciscos mcdonaldsizing
> of the track, etc... I don't think nailing craploads of CCIEs is the
> answer either, just being a good engineer is what really matters, right?
> Cisco would like us to think we need to nail more CCIEs, or even the
> vendors have invested interest in that approach (sorry guys, nothing
> personal). It makes them lots of $$$$$$
>
> Flame on...
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/19/07, Gary Duncanson <gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Correct. Or has what it takes. Opening up more testing seats does
> not
> necessarily mean an exponential increase in pass numbers. It just
> makes it
> easier to schedule a slot and tank the lab.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Brunner" <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
> To: <subodh.rawat@wipro.com>; < gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>;
> <Andrew.Usankin@twtelecom.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:43 PM
> Subject: RE: CCIE 19366
>
>
> > Wrong.
> >
> > Not that many people will commit what it takes.
> >
> > They just wont
> >
> > More seats? That's like saying if Mercedes makes more 600 V12
> biturbo's
> > CL-65's they will just be sold. There has to be demand and
> qualified
> > "buyers"
> >
> > -Joe
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of
> > subodh.rawat@wipro.com
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:03 PM
> > To: gary.duncanson@googlemail.com; Andrew.Usankin@twtelecom.com
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: CCIE 19366
> >
> > I think if Cisco makes 200 seats per day, there will be atleast
> 24000
> > CCIEs per year (considering 50% failure) or if failure is 25 %
> (which is
> > most likely the case in today's scenario) then this figure will be
> > atleast 36000 per year.
> >
> > I am not sure then this club will remain as exclusive as it is
> today. I
> > think Cisco should not increase seats from what it has capacity
> today,
> > (there was some noise sometime back that Cisco is going to open
> new
> > centers; no doubt it will help many people in many ways and I am
> no
> > exception) if they want to retain CCIE's value intact or else CCIE
> is
> > next CCNA or CCNP for that matter (definitely it takes atleast
> 10-12
> > months hard core study but today it is still very much possible to
> clear
> > in first attempt).
> >
> > But as I said in my earlier post, only knowledge will prevail not
> number
> > even if we are 1xCCIE or 5xCCIE.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Subodh
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto: nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of
> > Gary Duncanson
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:01 PM
> > To: Usankin, Andrew
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: CCIE 19366
> >
> > I agree it's a personal thing. For my part I still believe getting
> the
> > CCIE is a remarkable achievement. People have gone about rising
> numbers
> > ever since the program took off in the late 1990's. The fact
> remains
> > that the CCIE is difficult to obtain. There is an intellectual
> > requirement to passing this thing but perhaps just as important is
> the
> > degree of personal commitment and determination it takes to clear
> it.
> > People's milage will vary depending on freetime available to chase
> the
> > CCIE but regardless it still remains very difficult to get through
> it
> > whatever ligitimate resources you have at your disposal. You still
> have
> > to put the long hours and the hard miles in and that's something
> many
> > people still come up short on committing to. I know one CCIE who
> had the
> > best part of a year off work on full pay by his employer to
> concentrate
> > on preparing for the lab. Labbooks and books were paid for, so was
> rack
> > access, so were exam fees and flights..even a bootcamp was thrown
> in.
> > The guy studied hard. It took him 4 attempts to clear it a few
> years
> > ago.
> >
> > Literally hundreds of thousands of engineers have failed on the
> journey
> > to become a CCIE over the years. When you consider that the
> program has
> > been going 10 years and that less than 20000 CCIE's worldwide have
> > cleared the lab so I would say it's still a pretty exclusive club.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Usankin, Andrew" < Andrew.Usankin@twtelecom.com>
> > To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 4:45 PM
> > Subject: RE: CCIE 19366
> >
> >
> >> Everybody should decide for himself, but as to me - CCIE is not a
> >> remarkable achievement anymore. Take a loot at the number, it
> says it
> >> all. So if you still want to get to the hall of fame, you should
> get
> > at
> >> least two CCIE, three is better, 5 - is a group of people whom
> you can
> >> count on your fingers. :)
> >>
> >> Andrew
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of
> >> Gregory Gombas
> >> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:47 PM
> >> To: A.G. Ananth Sarma (GMail)
> >> Cc: Cisco certification
> >> Subject: Re: CCIE 19366
> >>
> >> Me too. I guarantee you it will soon say in job postings "CCIE
> with
> >> number below 20000 preferred". Cause you know after 20000 the
> CCIE is
> >> easy :-)
> >>
> >> On Nov 17, 2007 9:22 AM, A.G. Ananth Sarma (GMail)
> >> <ananth.sarma@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Congrats Joseph,
> >>>
> >>> By the way guys, the number really ticks very fast.
> >>>
> >>> I would like to catch up before it reaches 20k.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Ananth
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 17, 2007 8:55 AM, darth router <darklordrouter@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Grats Joseph. Whats next?
> >>> >
> >>> > DR
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 11/16/07, Gregory Gombas <ggombas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Congrats Joe! Very well deserved! I could tell from the way
> you
> >>> > > were banging out configs in our group study session that I
> would
> >>> > > see your number soon.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Security eh...that would be my choice for a second CCIE.
> >>> > > How bout I get this pesky R+S lab out of the way and we can
> fire
> >>> > > up the Security webex!
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Warmest Regards,
> >>> > > Greg
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Nov 16, 2007 6:55 AM, Joseph Brunner <
> joe@affirmedsystems.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> > > > First I want to thank god for all he has given me.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Second I would like to thank Howard, Bobby (RTP), Tom and
> Tong
> >>> > > > (SJ)
> >>> the
> >>> > > > proctors who work so hard to keep the lab running as
> smooth as
> >>> > > > it
> >>> does.
> >>> > > You
> >>> > > > are gentlemen, and even when I walked out with nothing and
> knew
> >>> > > > it, I
> >>> > > felt
> >>> > > > honored to challenge your creation.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Next I would like to Thank Brian Dennis, Brian McGahan,
> Scott
> >>> > > > Morris
> >>> and
> >>> > > > Narbik Kocharians. It's one thing to get your number and
> just
> >>> > > > sit in
> >>> the
> >>> > > > corner somewhere. It's a crowning achievement to use it to
> help
> >>> > > > others
> >>> > > share
> >>> > > > your achievement. Your participation here was a huge study
> >>> > > > motivation
> >>> to
> >>> > > me.
> >>> > > > Narbik I touched your name on the wall in RTP yesterday
> before
> > I
> >>> started
> >>> > > and
> >>> > > > I knew it was time.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Got to run, before somebody picks my security blueprint
> off the
> >>> printer.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Thanks!
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Joseph L. Brunner
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > CCIE #19366
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>>
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>> _
> >>> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> > __________________________________________________________________
> >>> > > _____ Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________
> >>> > ___
> >>> >
> >>> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> The content contained in this electronic message is not intended
> to
> >> constitute formation of a contract binding TWTC. TWTC will be
> >> contractually bound only upon execution, by an authorized
> officer, of
> >> a contract including agreed terms and conditions or by express
> >> application of its tariffs.
> >>
> >> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or
> entity
> >> to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not
> the
> >> intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
> >> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> >> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> >> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
> to
> >> the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone.
> >>
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this electronic message and any
> attachments
> > to
> > this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> addressee(s) and
> > may
> > contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If
> you are
> > not
> > the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
> copy
> > this
> > e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all
> copies of
> > this
> > message and any attachments.
> >
> > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The
> recipient
> > should
> > check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
> The
> > company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> > transmitted
> > by this email.
> >
> > www.wipro.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:30 ART