From: Tarun Pahuja (pahujat@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 15 2007 - 14:48:28 ART
Daniel,
Tunnel has overhead(new header).
Packets have to encapsulated and decapsulated by the routers.
Tunnel can go over a Stub area whereas a Virtual-link can not.
HTH,
Tarun
On Nov 15, 2007 12:36 PM, Snyder, Daniel P <DPSnyder@hammond.k12.in.us>
wrote:
> Is there any advantages/disadvantages of using a normal tunnel interface
> vs. a virtual link when trying to connect non-backbone area's to area 0?
> I wasn't sure if it was just a preference thing or not.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:30 ART