From: Vladimir Sousa (vladrac@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 15 2007 - 15:32:49 ART
they Can be used to connect one area over a NSSA area as well.
but unless necessary, I'd avoid it.
Vlad
On 11/15/07, Tarun Pahuja <pahujat@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Daniel,
>
> Tunnel has overhead(new header).
> Packets have to encapsulated and decapsulated by the routers.
> Tunnel can go over a Stub area whereas a Virtual-link can not.
>
> HTH,
> Tarun
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:36 PM, Snyder, Daniel P <DPSnyder@hammond.k12.in.us>
> wrote:
>
> > Is there any advantages/disadvantages of using a normal tunnel interface
> > vs. a virtual link when trying to connect non-backbone area's to area 0?
> > I wasn't sure if it was just a preference thing or not.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:30 ART