From: Rich Collins (nilsi2002@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Nov 13 2007 - 16:50:09 ART
Hi Wim,
I am not 100% sure. I will have to lab it up to verify but that is
the conclusion I had from some of the notes that I had.
Rich
On Nov 13, 2007 11:02 AM, De Pauw, Wim <Wim.DePauw@getronics.com> wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Sorry for the late reply ,if I understand correctly :
> When you don't specify the ntp server X.X.X.X <key> you won't have any
> authentication . I checked the previous answers of the ipexpert lab and
> they are all without the key specification so it means that they are
> wrong ??
>
> Gr
> wim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Collins [mailto:nilsi2002@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 19:42
> To: De Pauw, Wim
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Ipexpert Lab 36 Questions
>
> For your second question, your ntp client will sync up still but will
> be requesting and receiving time without using authentication. The NTP
> server will still respond but not include any authentication hash.
>
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2007 6:20 AM, <wim.depauw@getronics.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a couple of questions/remarks about Lab 36 of Ipexpert:
> >
> > - QOs Configuration : In the solution provided there are a lot of
> parameters like bc/be , frame-relay fragments but I can't deduct from
> the text if it is necessary to apply these parameters.It seems that they
> used a Tc of 1000 but where do they get it from ?
> >
> > - In the ntp solution they use ntp server 136.10.4.4 key <X> , is the
> key option really necessary , I thought you only needed to specify ntp
> authenticaton-key and ntp authenticate ?
> >
> > gr
> > wim
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:29 ART