From: Rich Collins (nilsi2002@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 29 2007 - 12:16:34 ART
Could you give some more information like at which router and which routing
protocol originates those bouncing networks? How are they showing up in the
ospf database and how are they getting tagged? How long do they stay in the
RIP database?
On 10/27/07, Jeffrey Biggs <j.biggs@myactv.net> wrote:
>
> During redistribution I followed the advice I received from the Scott and
> Brian. When I was done it looked just like the "final config" from
> IPEXPERT
> for router 5. But I am not getting that "quiescent" debug ip routing
> output, in fact it looks like RIP/OSPF are battling over some routes and I
> am wondering if I missed something. Can I get someone else take on this:
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.272: RT: delete network route to 212.212.3.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.272: RT: NET-RED 212.212.3.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: del 212.212.4.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
> [89/4]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: delete network route to 212.212.4.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: NET-RED 212.212.4.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: del 212.212.5.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
> [89/4]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: delete network route to 212.212.5.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: NET-RED 212.212.5.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: del 212.212.6.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
> [89/4]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: delete network route to 212.212.6.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: NET-RED 212.212.6.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: del 212.212.7.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
> [89/4]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: delete network route to 212.212.7.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: NET-RED 212.212.7.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: del 212.212.8.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
> [89/4]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: delete network route to 212.212.8.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: NET-RED 212.212.8.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.288: RT: del 212.212.9.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
> [89/4]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.288: RT: delete network route to 212.212.9.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.288: RT: NET-RED 212.212.9.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.288: RT: del 212.212.10.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
> [89/4]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: delete network route to 212.212.10.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: NET-RED 212.212.10.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: del 216.30.78.0/31 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
> [89/4]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: delete subnet route to 216.30.78.0/31
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: NET-RED 216.30.78.0/31
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.296: RT: delete network route to 216.30.78.0
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.296: RT: NET-RED 216.30.78.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.304: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 216.30.78.0/31
>
> NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
>
>
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.304: RT: add 216.30.78.0/31 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
> [110/
>
> 65]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.304: RT: NET-RED 216.30.78.0/31
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.308: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.10.0/24
>
> NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
>
>
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.312: RT: add 212.212.10.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf
> metric
> [110
>
> /85]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.312: RT: NET-RED 212.212.10.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.312: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.9.0/24
>
> NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
>
>
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.312: RT: add 212.212.9.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
> [110/
>
> 85]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.316: RT: NET-RED 212.212.9.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.316: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.8.0/24
>
> NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
>
>
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.316: RT: add 212.212.8.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
> [110/
>
> 85]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.316: RT: NET-RED 212.212.8.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.320: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.7.0/24
>
> NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
>
>
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.320: RT: add 212.212.7.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
> [110/
>
> 85]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.320: RT: NET-RED 212.212.7.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.320: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.6.0/24
>
> NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
>
>
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.324: RT: add 212.212.6.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
> [110/
>
> 85]
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.324: RT: NET-RED 212.212.6.0/24
>
> *Mar 1 03:12:22.324: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.5.0/24
>
> NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
>
>
>
> After pulling my hair out, I went to the answer configs and it looks like
> I
> have it exactly matching, but I know I should not be seeing this.
>
>
>
> HELP
>
> JB
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:19 ART