From: Jeffrey Biggs (j.biggs@myactv.net)
Date: Sat Oct 27 2007 - 16:38:55 ART
During redistribution I followed the advice I received from the Scott and
Brian. When I was done it looked just like the "final config" from IPEXPERT
for router 5. But I am not getting that "quiescent" debug ip routing
output, in fact it looks like RIP/OSPF are battling over some routes and I
am wondering if I missed something. Can I get someone else take on this:
*Mar 1 03:12:22.272: RT: delete network route to 212.212.3.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.272: RT: NET-RED 212.212.3.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: del 212.212.4.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric [89/4]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: delete network route to 212.212.4.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: NET-RED 212.212.4.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: del 212.212.5.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric [89/4]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.276: RT: delete network route to 212.212.5.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: NET-RED 212.212.5.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: del 212.212.6.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric [89/4]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: delete network route to 212.212.6.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: NET-RED 212.212.6.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.280: RT: del 212.212.7.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric [89/4]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: delete network route to 212.212.7.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: NET-RED 212.212.7.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: del 212.212.8.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric [89/4]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: delete network route to 212.212.8.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.284: RT: NET-RED 212.212.8.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.288: RT: del 212.212.9.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric [89/4]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.288: RT: delete network route to 212.212.9.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.288: RT: NET-RED 212.212.9.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.288: RT: del 212.212.10.0 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
[89/4]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: delete network route to 212.212.10.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: NET-RED 212.212.10.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: del 216.30.78.0/31 via 216.30.25.2, rip metric
[89/4]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: delete subnet route to 216.30.78.0/31
*Mar 1 03:12:22.292: RT: NET-RED 216.30.78.0/31
*Mar 1 03:12:22.296: RT: delete network route to 216.30.78.0
*Mar 1 03:12:22.296: RT: NET-RED 216.30.78.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.304: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 216.30.78.0/31
NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
*Mar 1 03:12:22.304: RT: add 216.30.78.0/31 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
[110/
65]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.304: RT: NET-RED 216.30.78.0/31
*Mar 1 03:12:22.308: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.10.0/24
NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
*Mar 1 03:12:22.312: RT: add 212.212.10.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
[110
/85]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.312: RT: NET-RED 212.212.10.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.312: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.9.0/24
NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
*Mar 1 03:12:22.312: RT: add 212.212.9.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
[110/
85]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.316: RT: NET-RED 212.212.9.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.316: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.8.0/24
NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
*Mar 1 03:12:22.316: RT: add 212.212.8.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
[110/
85]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.316: RT: NET-RED 212.212.8.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.320: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.7.0/24
NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
*Mar 1 03:12:22.320: RT: add 212.212.7.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
[110/
85]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.320: RT: NET-RED 212.212.7.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.320: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.6.0/24
NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
*Mar 1 03:12:22.324: RT: add 212.212.6.0/24 via 216.30.100.7, ospf metric
[110/
85]
*Mar 1 03:12:22.324: RT: NET-RED 212.212.6.0/24
*Mar 1 03:12:22.324: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 212.212.5.0/24
NEW rdb: via 216.30.100.7
After pulling my hair out, I went to the answer configs and it looks like I
have it exactly matching, but I know I should not be seeing this.
HELP
JB
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:18 ART