From: John Sparton (threeseashells@googlemail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2007 - 16:50:33 ART
I've been lucky enough to get a 4215. Would this be the same as or better
for CCIE study than the 4235 I already have? It's certainly a lot quieter
and smaller! :)
On 26/10/2007, Farrukh Haroon <farrukhharoon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thats true, but as far I know you cannot run version 6.x. on the 4210
> Sensor
> (at least that the official word). So if your query pertains to the
> security
> lab and your planned lab attempt is after 8-10 months, I would rather go
> for
> a 4235 sensor. But since you got it for free, I would grab it with both
> hands and start studying :)
>
> Regards
>
> Farrukh
>
>
>
> On 10/26/07, Khawar Butt <khawarb@khawarb.com> wrote:
> >
> > Once you put 5.1 on it, it gives you the option of Inline VLAN Pair. It
> > will allow you to run the IPS in inline mode. The difference will be
> > that on the Switch, the port will have to be made into a Dot1q trunk
> > port, whereas with the Interface Pair, the 2 ports would have been
> > access ports belonging to separate VLANs.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Khawar Butt
> > CCIE#12353 (R/S , Security , SP , Voice)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Definda Patel
> > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 5:59 PM
> > To: Graham Bartlett
> > Cc: Paul Dardinski; Michael Locke; ccielab@groupstudy.com;
> > security@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: IDS 4210
> >
> >
> > It is good. You can put 5.1 on there but you can not do inline.
> >
> > On 10/26/07, Graham Bartlett < Graham.Bartlett@eads.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I just used one to pass the CCSP IPS exam - they are good to learn on.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > Of Paul Dardinski
> > > Sent: 25 October 2007 15:49
> > > To: Michael Locke; ccielab@groupstudy.com; security@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: RE: IDS 4210
> > >
> > > 4210 is perfectly useable, albeit EOL. You need support contract to
> > > get latest sigs, blah, blah, blah...but if want basic box to play
> > > with, check cco for images.
> > >
> > > PD (#16842)
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > > Of Michael Locke
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:00 AM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; security@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: IDS 4210
> > >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > Quick question ... someone just gave me an IDS 4210. Don't think it's
> >
> > > been used for several years and I know it has been EOL.
> > >
> > > Is it worth trying to salvage?
> > >
> > > What's the latest version of code that I can run on it?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance!
> > > ml
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:18 ART