From: Gregory Gombas (ggombas@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2007 - 16:29:37 ART
No kidding?!
Would that still have been the case had they only allowed the data and
voice vlan in the trunk allowed vlan list?
On 10/26/07, Tarun Pahuja <pahujat@gmail.com> wrote:
> Additional Spanning tree instances on every additonal trunk port.....
>
> HTH,
> Tarun
>
> On 10/27/07, Gregory Gombas <ggombas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes Scott, that was quite a succinct yet crystal clear explanation - thanks!
> > Can we expect a "CCIE in a Nutshell" in book stores soon?
> >
> > Tarun, thanks for sharing - I'm curious how did using trunk ports impact CPU?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Greg
> >
> > On 10/26/07, Tarun Pahuja <pahujat@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Gregory,
> > > Scott did a tremendously job in explaining the concept.
> > > On Many switches even thought the port is configured as a trunk, the
> > > phone would still come up and register with the Call Manager.
> > >
> > > One of my customers called me one day and told me that his 6500 switch
> > > had 72% process utilization which was impacting performance.On
> > > Investigating the matter I found out that he had mis configured all 48
> > > ports on a line card as trunks ports for IP Phone connectivity.
> > > Removing the trunking on those ports and making them part of voice and
> > > access vlan brought the CPU utilization back to 19%.
> > >
> > > Some old network module switches still require administrator to
> > > configure them as trunk ports with native vlan for IP Phone
> > > connectivity.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > Tarun
> > >
> > > On 10/26/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> > > > IP Telephony itself isn't part of the lab, but familiarity with some of the
> > > > topics is a "good thing to know". :)
> > > >
> > > > In a nutshell, your voice vlan is sent with an 802.1Q tag and your PC/Data
> > > > traffic is sent untagged. In a "pure trunk" concept this means your PC data
> > > > would be your native vlan and you'd have a trunk running.
> > > >
> > > > For security purposes, people used to get all up in arms about needing to
> > > > use "switchport trunk allowed" and restrict what things could or could not
> > > > be sent over that trunk for the great fear of hackers. Cisco has made it
> > > > simpler with most switches where you can now simply be in 'switchport mode
> > > > access'.
> > > >
> > > > This, when we look at it, doesn't allow trunking. The 'switchport voice
> > > > vlan' command, however, provides a specific override allowing tagging of one
> > > > single vlan only. So we've made things better for the security conscious as
> > > > well as simpler for the configuration.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
> > > > #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> > > > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> > > > VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> > > > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> > > >
> > > > A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
> > > >
> > > > smorris@ipexpert.com
> > > >
> > > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > > > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> > > > http://www.ipexpert.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > > Gregory Gombas
> > > > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:27 AM
> > > > To: Cisco certification
> > > > Subject: IP Telephony Topics for R+S
> > > >
> > > > Not sure if IP telephony is in scope for the R+S but seems to crop up in the
> > > > IE workbooks a lot. I was hoping someone could help clear up some confusion:
> > > >
> > > > 1. When connecting an cisco IP phone to a 3550/3560, does it automatically
> > > > create an 802.1q trunk?
> > > >
> > > > 2. According to the DOC cd:
> > > > "You can configure an access port with an attached Cisco IP Phone to use one
> > > > VLAN for voice traffic and another VLAN for data traffic from a device
> > > > attached to the phone. "
> > > >
> > > > How is it possible two have two different VLANS run over a switch port
> > > > configured in access mode?
> > > >
> > > > 3. Can someone recommend some good (but short) reads for connecting IP
> > > > telephones to Cisco switches? I already have this one:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12240se/scg/swvo
> > > > ip.htm
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Greg
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:18 ART