frame relay voice adap

From: Navid Daghighi (daghighi.navid@free.fr)
Date: Mon Oct 15 2007 - 19:16:57 ART

• Next message: Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta: "RE: Passed at RTP Oct 12 #19093"
• Previous message: H M: "Re: Be encouraged"
• Next in thread: Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta: "RE: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta: "RE: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Mark Mahan: "RE: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Wink: "Re: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Mark Snow: "Re: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Gregory Gombas: "Re: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: frame relay voice adap"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

Cisco doc says :

"Frame Relay voice-adaptive traffic shaping enables a router to reduce
the permanent virtual circuit
(PVC) sending rate to the minimum CIR (minCIR) whenever packets (usually
voice) are detected in the
low latency queueing priority queue or H.323 call setup signaling
packets are present."

Why would it be useful to reduce the sending rate, when there are
packets in a priority queue ?

Thanks,
Navid

• Next message: Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta: "RE: Passed at RTP Oct 12 #19093"
• Previous message: H M: "Re: Be encouraged"
• Next in thread: Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta: "RE: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Wilson, Ryan # Atlanta: "RE: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Mark Mahan: "RE: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Wink: "Re: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Mark Snow: "Re: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Gregory Gombas: "Re: frame relay voice adap"
• Maybe reply: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: frame relay voice adap"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:15 ART