From: Eric Leung (eric.lwc@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 09 2007 - 10:35:18 ART
Hi CCIE101,
I guess cluster-id is only used for route-reflector redundancy.
If both RRs in a cluster are up, both of them will be active; And what
important is the clients of both RR don't know they are clients, so there is
no concept of "active RR in the cluster".
HTH
Eric
2007/10/9, ccie1101 <ccie1101@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi GS,
> My question is that if there is a scenario whereby the iBGP peering
> could have two possible route-reflectors we would need to complete the
> iBGP
> peering.
> In this instance, should we :-
>
> 1) just use any one ibgp peer as the route-reflector OR
> 2) create a bgp cluster-id and use the same cluster-id for both the
> route-reflectors ??
>
> 3) Also, what is the show command to check th bgp cluster-id ? I could
> not
> find the show command on the DOC CD.... The reason is that
> at a later date, one would definetely like to check if there was a
> redundant RR for that particular cluster AND also how do we check
> the active RR in the cluster ?
>
> Thanking you in advance,
>
> Cheers,
> -ccie1101.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:12 ART