From: ruth@mycomputer.co.uk
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 11:21:03 ART
Thanks Victor.
I had a mess around with it and the routes propagated to the
other peer when I put no synchronization on. Why would this make a difference
within an AS? I am not using looback addresses for neighbors and everything is
reachable since the peers come up.
----- Original Message ----
From: Victor
Cappuccio <vcappuccio@gmail.com>
To: "ruth@mycomputer.co.uk"
<rswgreat@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Saturday, 29
September, 2007 3:08:55 PM
Subject: Re: BGP Peers
Hello Ruth,
Can you
please send us the show ip bgp summ
can you reach the peers from reaching each
other?
Can you do a extended ping from the BGP neighbors to see if you have
reachability to the neighbor address, are you using the loopbacks?? did you
used the neigh update source command?
Can you send us a ASCII diagram of the
configuration?
You can also use deb ip tcp to see what is craking...
Just a
thought
On 9/29/07, ruth@mycomputer.co.uk <rswgreat@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have 3 BGPs peers up in the same AS, but only two of them are
exchanging
> BGP routes.
>
> Any ideas what would cause this?
>
> Thanks
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:16 ART