From: Shine Joseph (shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Wed Sep 26 2007 - 04:57:07 ART
Subodh,
The first one is a valid configuration.
The second configuration is not valid and the switch would reject the
command when you try to configure. Please see below the error message.
SW2(config-if)#channel-protocol pagp
SW2(config-if)#
02:09:08: %EC-5-ERRPROT2: Command rejected: the interface Fa0/14 is already
part of a channel with a different type of protocol enabled
HTH,
Shine
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
subodh.rawat@wipro.com
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2007 2:32 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: question on Channel-protocol configuration
Hi Group,
Please let me know what is the result of below configurations:
interface FastEthernet0/20
no switchport
no ip address
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 1 mode desirable
AND
interface FastEthernet0/20
no switchport
no ip address
channel-protocol pagp
channel-group 1 mode active
Assuming other end in the configuration is "channel-group 1 mode
desirable" and "channel-group 1 mode passive" respectively.
Subodh
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
company
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this
email.
www.wipro.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:16 ART