From: Theo M (theorack@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 21 2007 - 15:28:05 ART
As I said above, it's obvious why the diagram is correct, I just got
confused w/ the hardware connections diagram, before of too much coffee and
no sleep.
It took me 10 minutes to sort it out.
The conclusion for me: next time it happens, just get some sleep, instead
of posting stupid questions to the list ;-)
--On 9/21/07, Gregory Gombas <ggombas@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey are you sure they are not using some sort of dot1q or L2 tunneling? > > On 9/20/07, Theo M <theorack@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What's up with the Fa0/21 as an L3 interface on SW1, in the Core Lab1 > > diagram ?!? > > > > By looking in the hardware connectivity specifications, it should be > > connected to Fa0/21 on SW4. > > The diagram for this lab shows SW1::Fa0/21 as an L3 interface directly > > connected to R5, > > but in fact that interface is part of the EtherChannel that we have > > configured between SW1 and SW4, > > even per the Solution Guide ! > > > > The initial config for SW1 also configures this as an L3 interfaces. > > > > Can somebody clear this up, please ? > > > > I hope it's not the coffeine, I double-checked the physical > connectivity > > specs and SW1::Fa0/21 isn't even > > connected to anything. > > > > I'll use SW1::Vlan57 instead, for the moment ( I suspect a typo). > > > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:15 ART