From: Ben (bmunyao@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 20 2007 - 08:38:45 ART
Oops.... Just realised that the command "sh queueing int s1/0" is for
verifying interface queues, whereas the scenario implements shaping queues.
I wonder if there is a way to establish if the aggregate bandwidth
guarantees for the CBWFQ classes is within the shaping rate?
TIA
Ben
On 9/20/07, Ben <bmunyao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I would like your assistance or input with the following QOS scenario
>
> The scenario: R5 has a point to point FR subinterface to R1, and a point
> subinterface to R3, R4. Access rate at R1, R3 and R5 are 64Kbps, 64Kbps and
> T1 respectively. Each DLCI is provisioned with a CIR of 56Kbps.
>
> The task: Configure MQC-only traffic shaping at CIR for the R5-R1 and
> R5-R3 PVCs at CIR target rate, with excess burst to AR. Configure CBWFQ for
> the R5-R3 PVC with voice traffic limited to 32Kbps and a burst of 4000bytes
> in a second.
>
>
> P2P
> -------------------R1
> /
> R5---< FR
> \
> ------------------R3,R4
> P2MP
>
> My solution at R5:
> R5
> class-map VOICE
> match ip rtp 16384 16383
> class-map FR_PVC_503
> match fr-dlci 503
> class-map FR_PVC_504
> match fr-dlci 504
>
> policy-map CBWFQ
> class VOICE
> priority 32 4000
> policy-map SHAPE
> class FR_PVC_503
> shape average 56000 7000 1000
> service-policy CBWFQ
> class FR_PVC_504
> shape average 56000 7000 1000
>
> int s1/0
> service out SHAPE
> int s1/0.345 mult
> band 64
> int s1/0.1 point
> band 64
>
> Problem: When I verify shaping using "show policy-map int s1/0", and
> generate some transit traffic to trigger shaping, my solution works fine.
> How can I verify available bandwidth for the R5-R3 PVC, since I have CBWFQ
> on that PVC? I tried using "show queueing int s1/0" without success.
>
>
> TIA
> Ben
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:14 ART