From: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com
Date: Tue Sep 18 2007 - 17:37:30 ART
I think that 9 times out of 10 they are going to say you cannot use a
command by specifying the root of the command (default-information
originate). This of course implies all variations that feature
additional keywords!
If they were to spell out the exact command structure they did not want,
and you realize you can do it with another variation of that command,
then perhaps you truly have an "ask the proctor" type moment.
I would still say that as a rule of thumb, if they ask you not to use a
command, they are looking for another approach altogether.
Anthony J Sequeira
#15626
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Sadiq Yakasai
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 4:19 PM
To: groupstudy
Subject: What would you do?
Hey Guys,
So I have been wondering about scenarios of this sort please and would
appreciate some opinions on it.
So if a question, for example, says: Configure router X to advertise a
default route to router Y but do not use the "default-information
originate always" command.
Would it be safe to assume I can use other variations of the command?
Or I am pushing my luck too far?
Say, use the "default-information originate" without the "always"
keyword, or just simply other variations of the command that are not
exactly the one I have been prohibited to use.
Thanks
Sadiq
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:13 ART