What would you do?

From: Sadiq Yakasai (sadiqtanko@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 18 2007 - 17:19:09 ART

Next message: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com: "RE: What would you do?"
Previous message: Travis Anderson: "Re: Passed in San Jose on the 17th"
Next in thread: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com: "RE: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com: "RE: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: Ronnie Angello: "Re: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: Ben: "Re: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: Ronnie Angello: "Re: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: What would you do?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hey Guys,

So I have been wondering about scenarios of this sort please and would
appreciate some opinions on it.

So if a question, for example, says: Configure router X to advertise a
default route to router Y but do not use the "default-information
originate always" command.

Would it be safe to assume I can use other variations of the command?
Or I am pushing my luck too far?

Say, use the "default-information originate" without the "always"
keyword, or just simply other variations of the command that are not
exactly the one I have been prohibited to use.

Thanks

Sadiq

Next message: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com: "RE: What would you do?"
Previous message: Travis Anderson: "Re: Passed in San Jose on the 17th"
Next in thread: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com: "RE: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: anthony.sequeira@thomson.com: "RE: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: Ronnie Angello: "Re: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: Ben: "Re: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: Ronnie Angello: "Re: What would you do?"
Maybe reply: Sadiq Yakasai: "Re: What would you do?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:13 ART