From: Caleb Dick (CalebD@aos5.com)
Date: Mon Sep 17 2007 - 10:08:09 ART
Throw in another switch and have the RSPAN session terminate on that
switch. The extra switch is only there for the monitor traffic.
Otherwise your pretty much stuck, even according to cisco TAC, I just
went through this with a customer. We went with the extra switch
option.
Caleb Dick
Systems Engineer
IP Phone: 636-680-1026
Cell: 314-650-9022
www.aos5.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ben
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 6:53 AM
To: Shine Joseph
Cc: Vijay Yadav; Akaradeth N@MS@DCTH-BKK; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: R-SPAN question
Oops! Sorry about that. Apparently 3560's don't support RSPAN and local
SPAN
in a single session either.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12237se/scg/
swspan.htm
"The switch does not support a combination of local SPAN and RSPAN in a
single session. That is, an RSPAN source session cannot have a local
destination port, an RSPAN destination session cannot have a local
source
port, and an RSPAN destination session and an RSPAN source session that
are
using the same RSPAN VLAN cannot run on the same switch."
Thanks Shine for the pointer.
Ben
On 9/17/07, Shine Joseph <shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> You cannot add SPAN and RSPAN sources on 3550s. I am just wondering,
what
> would be the best solution for 3550s?
>
> Regards,
> Shine
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Ben
> Sent: Monday, 17 September 2007 8:44 PM
> To: Vijay Yadav
> Cc: Akaradeth N@MS@DCTH-BKK; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: R-SPAN question
>
> Akaradeth,
>
> IMO
>
> 2)
>
> Sw1#
>
> Monitor session 1 source vlan 100 rx
>
> Monitor session 1 destination remote vlan 999
>
>
>
> Sw2#
>
> Monitor session 1 source vlan 100
>
> Monitor session 1 source remote vlan 999
>
> Monitor session 1 destination int fa0/10
>
>
> HTH
> Ben
>
>
>
> On 9/17/07, Vijay Yadav <vijay@vijayyadav.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > According to me below mentioned configuration will work:
> >
> > Sw1#
> >
> > Monitor session 1 source vlan 100 rx
> >
> > Monitor session 1 destination remote vlan 999 reflect fa0/19
> >
> >
> >
> > Sw2#
> >
> > Monitor session 1 source vlan 999
> >
> > Monitor session 1 destination int fa0/10
> >
> >
> > Rgds,
> >
> > Vijay
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/17/07, Akaradeth N@MS@DCTH-BKK <Akaradeth.N@datacraft-asia.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have question about remote span, which configuration is a
correct
> one,
> > > (1) or (2)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SW1 vlan 100, remote span vlan 999
> > >
> > > SW2 vlan 100, remote span vlan 999, IPS on port fa0/10
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (1)
> > >
> > > Sw1#
> > >
> > > Monitor session 1 source vlan 100 rx
> > >
> > > Monitor session 1 destination remote vlan 999 reflect fa0/19
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sw2#
> > >
> > > Monitor session 1 source vlan 100 , 999 rx
> > >
> > > Monitor session 1 destination int fa0/10
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (2)
> > >
> > > Sw1#
> > >
> > > Monitor session 1 source vlan 100 rx
> > >
> > > Monitor session 1 destination remote vlan 999 reflect fa0/19
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sw2#
> > >
> > > Monitor session 1 source vlan 100
> > >
> > > Monitor session 1 destination int fa0/10
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Monitor session 2 source remote vlan 999
> > >
> > > Monitor session 2 destination int fa0/10
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank in advance
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Akaradeth
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
************************************************************************
****
> > > This email and all contents are subject to the following
disclaimer:
> > >
> > > http://www.datacraft-asia.com/disclaimer
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
************************************************************************
****
> > >
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:12 ART