From: abderrahim sadki (a_sadki1@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 10 2007 - 01:13:18 ART
Sorry i just realized that the /5 was the cisco notation for the subnet mask
im used to /16 or /27 stuff..i got confused lol...
oups!
Abderrahim> From: shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au> To: a_sadki1@hotmail.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com> Subject: RE: lab 16-task 5.2-multicast access-list
mask- silly question> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:40:03 +1000> > It looks like
the first ACL matches 224.0.0.0 to 231.255.255.255 and the> second one matches
from 232.0.0.0 to 238.255.255.255. > > I think, what you are asking is why not
> deny 239.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 > permit 232.0.0.0 7.255.255.255> > If I understand
you correctly, the group-list ACL cannot have deny> statement. It supports
only permit statement.> > HTH,> Shine> > -----Original Message-----> From:
nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> abderrahim
sadki> Sent: Sunday, 9 September 2007 6:17 PM> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: lab 16-task 5.2-multicast access-list mask- silly question> > hi> >
In this task 2 acl are required> one matching 224.0.0.0/5 the other matching
232.0.0.0/5> > the solution shows this for 224.0.0.0/5:> > ip access-list
standard GROUP_224> permit 224.0.0.0 7.255.255.255> > and for 232.0.0.0/5> ip
access-list standard GROUP_232> permit 232.0.0.0 3.255.255.255> permit
236.0.0.0 1.255.255.255> permit 238.0.0.0 0.255.255.255> > > > can someone
explain this to me?> > Thanks> Abderrahim> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART