From: Antonio Soares (amsoares@netcabo.pt)
Date: Sat Sep 08 2007 - 21:20:26 ART
Please check again: are they asking to support or to not support those users
?
Regards,
Antonio Soares
CCIE #18473, CCNP, CCIP
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Julio Carrasco
Sent: sabado, 8 de Setembro de 2007 22:34
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Proxy-arp task.(IEWB v4.1 task 9.1
Hi guys,
I am doing a task from IEWB that says that:
There are a few hosts in a network segment that have its own IP addresses
instead of R6 configured as default-gateway, configure R6 and R2 to support
this hosts.
The network eschema is like that:
R6 R2
.6 | Interface f0/0.26 .2 | Interface f0/0.26
| |
----------------------------------------------------------
I have configured IP proxy arp on interface f0/0.26 on R6, so R6 replies the
ARPs for other netorks destination.
But the IEWB solution does exactly the opposite, ussing the "no ip
proxy-arp"
on both R2 and R6 interfaces. Do you know why they did that ?
Thanks in advance,
Julio.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART