From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2007 - 23:17:34 ART
That is true. I usually nail those, as in with the IE WB VOL II. I did
strong. I missed a few minor non-core connectivity tweaks, and I suspect I
left a few things SHUTDOWN for task verification. That is why "I SUCK".
LOL
_____
From: Narbik Kocharians [mailto:narbikk@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 10:12 PM
To: ISolveSystems
Cc: Joseph Brunner; Gary Duncanson; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: I suck - Task Interpretation
If you have done many protocol specific labs and know the details of each
protocols, what they offer and where they lack, you will have a better
understanding of the hidden words.
On 9/5/07, ISolveSystems <support@isolvesystems.com> wrote:
How does one improve tasks interpretation?
On 9/5/07, Joseph Brunner < <mailto:joe@affirmedsystems.com>
joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
>
> Interpretation of the tasks is 99% of becoming a CCIE, and yes passing the
> lab. I honestly got 20+ "hard points" in less than 1 hour... so can I do
> it
> better or faster?
>
> No. The thing I need to work on I think the interpretation of task A is
> intertwined with the restrictions of task B. Quite ingenious.
>
> Now for the fun stuff... I finally found out why Cisco charges so much per
> attempt... one guy yesterday kept leaving his pod for like 15 minutes
> breaks
> all morning, after lunch, etc. he would come in, scrawl a few things down,
> huff and say "come on", just generally be annoying. The proctor I think
> said
> something to him about "sitting down".
>
> It got so comical I thought he had rack access in the bathroom. Even a
> Four-Star General Like Brian Dennis or Scott Morris couldn't pass a CCIE
> lab
> SPENDING only 1/3 of the day at their damn rack!
>
> So, the $1,250 is a nice speed bump for these free wheelin' written
> testkingers...
>
> -Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Gary
> Duncanson
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 10:23 AM
> To: Joseph Brunner
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: I suck
>
> Joe,
>
> Never mind. Are you wiser for the attempt? Anything you would change in
> your
>
> preparation?
>
> Gary
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Brunner" <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 2:31 PM
> Subject: I suck
>
>
> > Who gets all the BGP/QOS/SECURITY points and STILL FAILS the LAB?
> >
> >
> >
> > LOL,
> >
> >
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:09 ART