From: slevin kremera (slevin.kremera@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 29 2007 - 20:09:13 ART
from what i have observed,the second one is better..
SK
On 8/30/07, shiran guez <shiranp3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I would like to know if there is a problem with me configuring
>
> interface Serial1/0
> ip address 182.158.123.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template12
> frame-relay interface-dlci 103 ppp Virtual-Templat13
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> !
> interface Virtual-Template12
> ip unnumbered Serial1/0
> !
> interface Virtual-Template13
> ip unnumbered Serial1/0
>
>
> OR the better way is:
>
> interface Serial1/0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template12
> frame-relay interface-dlci 103 ppp Virtual-Templat13
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> !
> interface Virtual-Template12
> ip address 182.158.123.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Virtual-Template13
> ip address 182.158.123.1 255.255.255.0
>
> and why? as my logic tell me the first is more logical then the second but
> in the IEWB solution guid I see the bellow solution more often.
>
> --
> Shiran Guez
> MCSE CCNP NCE1
> http://cciep3.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:13 ART