From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed Aug 29 2007 - 20:29:38 ART
Actually I don't think that we ever use the first solution you have below.
Brian Dennis, CCIE4 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
>----- Original Message -----
Subject: FRAME RELAY PPP
Date: Wed, August 29, 2007 12:27
From: "shiran guez" <shiranp3@gmail.com>
> Hi
>
> I would like to know if there is a problem with me configuring
>
> interface Serial1/0
> ip address 182.158.123.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template12
> frame-relay interface-dlci 103 ppp Virtual-Templat13
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> !
> interface Virtual-Template12
> ip unnumbered Serial1/0
> !
> interface Virtual-Template13
> ip unnumbered Serial1/0
>
>
> OR the better way is:
>
> interface Serial1/0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template12
> frame-relay interface-dlci 103 ppp Virtual-Templat13
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> !
> interface Virtual-Template12
> ip address 182.158.123.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Virtual-Template13
> ip address 182.158.123.1 255.255.255.0
>
> and why? as my logic tell me the first is more logical then the second but
> in the IEWB solution guid I see the bellow solution more often.
>
> --
> Shiran Guez
> MCSE CCNP NCE1
> http://cciep3.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:13 ART