From: Phillip McCollum (phillip.mccollum@ins.com)
Date: Thu Aug 23 2007 - 15:11:21 ART
Haven't had a chance to lab this up yet, but...
Can you join the igmp group from the R5<->R2 interface? I think R2 would not
prune at that point and you could issue ip multicast multipath on R3? I
could be way off here, but just a quick guess.
Thanks,
Phillip
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ISolveSystems
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 10:23 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: IEWB 13 Task 4.2 - IP PIM Dense mode load balancing
R5,R3, R2, R1 are connected through Serial int. Pim dense-mode is enable on
all interfaces of R5, R3, R2, but not R1.
R5------R1------R3
\ /
\ /
\R2 /
Tunnel is built from R3 to R5. Ip igmp join-group 225.5.5.5 is issued on R5
ethernet interface.
Ping traffic from behind R3 should be load balance between R2 and the tunnel
according to the solution. However, since R2 is prunning the group, the
traffic only goes through the tunnel.
How to resolve this to enable load balance?
Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:12 ART