From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2007 - 15:38:06 ART
Julio did you try a different IOS?
On 8/14/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that popped into my head as I was skimming over some of the
> responses
> and thought you may be doing that. You need to influence the OSPF
> election
> first using metrics, or LSA type (intra vs. inter vs. external). After
> that
> is completed, THEN the distance command will help in the routing table.
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
> #153, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>
> A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>
> smorris@ipexpert.com
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julio Carrasco [mailto:julio.carrasco@ya.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 6:00 AM
> To: smorris@ipexpert.com; 'NET HE'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: OSPF Issue with Distance
>
> I was using this command, cause the OSPF process is injecting two routes
> (load balancing), and I wanted to install just one at the routing table,
> so
> reducing the distance of the one that I wanted tobe installed in the
> routing
> table, seemed a good idea.
>
> Thanks !
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Morris" <smorris@ipexpert.com>
> To: "'NET HE'" <he_net@hotmail.com>; <julio.carrasco@ya.com>;
> <smorris@ipexpert.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 6:19 AM
> Subject: RE: OSPF Issue with Distance
>
>
> > Just one more note while I'm thinking about it... Let's assume
> > there's more than one router injecting those networks into the area.
> > Your distance command would need to reflect the router-id of the one
> > who was WINNING the OSPF RIB election and being handed to the routing
> > table.
> >
> > If you were picking the losing one, you'd not see any difference until
> > the other router was shut off/removed.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> > JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> > VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> >
> > A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
> >
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> >
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of NET HE
> > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 6:39 PM
> > To: julio.carrasco@ya.com; smorris@ipexpert.com;
> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: OSPF Issue with Distance
> >
> > Please use command "sh ip ospf database" to see the router-id of the
> > real advertising router for these routes.
> >
> > Speaking of your configuration, your router is in area 1, and routes
> > "139.3.6.0 and 139.3.7.0" are interarea routes. In other words, the
> > real router advertising these two routes are ABR of area 1, instead of
> > original router which inject these two routes into ospf domain.
> >
> > So puting the router-id of area 1 into the command surely will work.
> >
> >
> >>From: "Julio Carrasco" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>
> >>Reply-To: "Julio Carrasco" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>
> >>To: <smorris@ipexpert.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >>Subject: Re: OSPF Issue with Distance
> >>Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:48:19 +0200
> >>MIME-Version: 1.0
> >>Received: from lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by
> >>bay0-mc12-f14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668);
> >>Mon,
> >>13 Aug 2007 06:02:39 -0700
> >>Received: (from sympa@localhost)by lists.groupstudy.com
> >>(8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id l7DD2ZAt012882;Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:02:35
> >>-0400
> >>Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.51.144.7])by
> >>lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
> >>l7DCmhZ1012480for <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2007
> >>08:48:43 -0400
> >>Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by
> >>groupstudy.com
> >>(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7DCmkqd004507GroupStudy
> >>Mailer; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:48:46 -0400
> >>Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com
> >>(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id l7DCmkIW004505for
> >>ccielabxhiddenx; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:48:46 -0400
> >>Received: from smtpauth.ya.com (smtp02.ya.com [62.151.11.161]) by
> >>groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7DCmiKx004478
> >>GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:48:45 -0400
> >>Received: from [89.130.44.183] (helo=Julkun) by smtpauth.ya.com with
> >>asmtp id 1IKZLY-0003Xs-00; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:48:36 +0200
> >>X-Message-Delivery: Vj0zLjQuMDt1cz0wO2k9MDtsPTA7YT0w
> >>X-Message-Info:
> >>+ECsOKemykfesWAtthZo51NjGIlkWNfMUOBmTAlOkjINqLYWQikG3daceZ2XML8RJZgFdv
> >>+Z
> >>+yX7QsNVqkkhgxgLtO1cJS9wuQ
> >>References: <5B2A3A856C3241C9AD9958C4B8D8F434@Julkun>
> >><061901c7dda5$a94b1180$1578010a@amer.cisco.com>
> >>X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480
> >>X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from julio\.carrasco@ya\.com] (2007/08/13
> >>08:48:46)
> >>X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>X-Sequence: 19951
> >>Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
> >>Precedence: bulk
> >>X-no-archive: yes
> >>List-Id: <ccielab.groupstudy.com>
> >>List-Help: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=help>
> >>List-Subscribe:
> >><mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=subscribe%20ccielab>
> >>List-Unsubscribe:
> >><mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=unsubscribe%20ccielab>
> >>List-Post: <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >>List-Owner: <mailto:ccielab-request@groupstudy.com>
> >>Return-Path: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
> >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2007 13:02:39.0972 (UTC)
> >>FILETIME=[3A8B1240:01C7DDAA]
> >>
> >>I tried first with "distance 109 150.3.1.1 0.0.0.0" that is the OSPF
> >>router Id of the router that injected the router, and didn4t work also.
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Julio.
> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Morris"
> >><smorris@ipexpert.com>
> >>To: "'Julio Carrasco'" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>;
> >><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:29 PM
> >>Subject: RE: OSPF Issue with Distance
> >>
> >>
> >>>With OSPF, the "139.3.15.1 0.0.0.0" portion of the distance command
> >>>references who injected these LSAs into the area. Check out your
> >>>"show ip ospf database" for those two routes and make sure they match
> >>>the router id of that device.
> >>>
> >>>Who you see as next hop is not necessarily who brought the routes
> >>>into the area.
> >>>
> >>>HTH,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> >>>JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
> >>>CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
> >>>VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> >>>IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> >>>
> >>>A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
> >>>
> >>>smorris@ipexpert.com
> >>>
> >>>Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >>>Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> >>>http://www.ipexpert.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> >>>Of Julio Carrasco
> >>>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 8:24 AM
> >>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>>Subject: OSPF Issue with Distance
> >>>
> >>>Hi Group,
> >>>
> >>>I am trying to configure r5 to change the ospf distnce for some
> >>>routes learnt from router 1 (139.3.15.1) to 109.
> >>>The config I have is:
> >>>
> >>>router ospf 1
> >>>log-adjacency-changes
> >>>redistribute rip subnets
> >>>network 139.3.15.5 0.0.0.0 area 1
> >>>neighbor 139.3.15.2
> >>>neighbor 139.3.15.1
> >>>distance 109 139.3.15.1 0.0.0.0 OSPF
> >>>!
> >>>ip access-list standard OSPF
> >>>permit 139.3.2.0 0.0.0.255
> >>>permit 139.3.6.0 0.0.0.255
> >>>permit 139.3.7.0 0.0.0.255
> >>>permit 139.3.11.0 0.0.0.255
> >>>permit 139.3.0.0 0.0.0.255
> >>>!
> >>>
> >>>but When i do a show ip route, I have this:
> >>>
> >>>O IA 139.3.6.0 [110/130] via 139.3.15.2, 00:30:47, Serial0/0/0
> >>> [110/130] via 139.3.15.1, 00:30:47, Serial0/0/0
> >>>O IA 139.3.7.0 [110/130] via 139.3.15.2, 00:30:47, Serial0/0/0
> >>> [110/130] via 139.3.15.1, 00:30:47, Serial0/0/0
> >>>
> >>>Do anyone know why networks 139.3.6.0 and 139.3.7.0 remains with
> >>>distance 110 ??
> >>>
> >>>I am sure, I am missing something or I am doing something stupid, fut
> >>>I can4t find out what is.
> >>>
> >>>TIA,
> >>>Julio.
> >>>
> >>>_____________________________________________________________________
> >>>_ _ Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>______________________________________________________________________
> >>_ Subscription information may be found at:
> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Put Your Face In Your Space with Windows Live Spaces
> > http://spaces.live.com/?mkt=en-ca
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) CCSI# 30832 www.Net-WorkBooks.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART