From: Julio Carrasco (julio.carrasco@ya.com)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2007 - 18:38:53 ART
I am sorry Narbik, but I am working on hired labs, so I cannot change the
sofware images of the routers :(.
Cheers,
Julio.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk@gmail.com>
To: "Scott Morris" <smorris@ipexpert.com>
Cc: "Julio Carrasco" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>; "NET HE" <he_net@hotmail.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF Issue with Distance
> Julio did you try a different IOS?
>
> On 8/14/07, Scott Morris <smorris@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that popped into my head as I was skimming over some of the
>> responses
>> and thought you may be doing that. You need to influence the OSPF
>> election
>> first using metrics, or LSA type (intra vs. inter vs. external). After
>> that
>> is completed, THEN the distance command will help in the routing table.
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>>
>> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
>> #153, CISSP, et al.
>> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
>> VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
>> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>>
>> A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>>
>> smorris@ipexpert.com
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>> http://www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Julio Carrasco [mailto:julio.carrasco@ya.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 6:00 AM
>> To: smorris@ipexpert.com; 'NET HE'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: Re: OSPF Issue with Distance
>>
>> I was using this command, cause the OSPF process is injecting two routes
>> (load balancing), and I wanted to install just one at the routing table,
>> so
>> reducing the distance of the one that I wanted tobe installed in the
>> routing
>> table, seemed a good idea.
>>
>> Thanks !
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Scott Morris" <smorris@ipexpert.com>
>> To: "'NET HE'" <he_net@hotmail.com>; <julio.carrasco@ya.com>;
>> <smorris@ipexpert.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 6:19 AM
>> Subject: RE: OSPF Issue with Distance
>>
>>
>> > Just one more note while I'm thinking about it... Let's assume
>> > there's more than one router injecting those networks into the area.
>> > Your distance command would need to reflect the router-id of the one
>> > who was WINNING the OSPF RIB election and being handed to the routing
>> > table.
>> >
>> > If you were picking the losing one, you'd not see any difference until
>> > the other router was shut off/removed.
>> >
>> > HTH,
>> >
>> >
>> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>> > JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
>> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
>> > VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
>> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>> >
>> > A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>> >
>> > smorris@ipexpert.com
>> >
>> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>> > http://www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> > Of NET HE
>> > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 6:39 PM
>> > To: julio.carrasco@ya.com; smorris@ipexpert.com;
>> > ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> > Subject: Re: OSPF Issue with Distance
>> >
>> > Please use command "sh ip ospf database" to see the router-id of the
>> > real advertising router for these routes.
>> >
>> > Speaking of your configuration, your router is in area 1, and routes
>> > "139.3.6.0 and 139.3.7.0" are interarea routes. In other words, the
>> > real router advertising these two routes are ABR of area 1, instead of
>> > original router which inject these two routes into ospf domain.
>> >
>> > So puting the router-id of area 1 into the command surely will work.
>> >
>> >
>> >>From: "Julio Carrasco" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>
>> >>Reply-To: "Julio Carrasco" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>
>> >>To: <smorris@ipexpert.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >>Subject: Re: OSPF Issue with Distance
>> >>Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:48:19 +0200
>> >>MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >>Received: from lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by
>> >>bay0-mc12-f14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668);
>> >>Mon,
>> >>13 Aug 2007 06:02:39 -0700
>> >>Received: (from sympa@localhost)by lists.groupstudy.com
>> >>(8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id l7DD2ZAt012882;Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:02:35
>> >>-0400
>> >>Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.51.144.7])by
>> >>lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
>> >>l7DCmhZ1012480for <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2007
>> >>08:48:43 -0400
>> >>Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by
>> >>groupstudy.com
>> >>(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7DCmkqd004507GroupStudy
>> >>Mailer; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:48:46 -0400
>> >>Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com
>> >>(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id l7DCmkIW004505for
>> >>ccielabxhiddenx; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:48:46 -0400
>> >>Received: from smtpauth.ya.com (smtp02.ya.com [62.151.11.161]) by
>> >>groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7DCmiKx004478
>> >>GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:48:45 -0400
>> >>Received: from [89.130.44.183] (helo=Julkun) by smtpauth.ya.com with
>> >>asmtp id 1IKZLY-0003Xs-00; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:48:36 +0200
>> >>X-Message-Delivery: Vj0zLjQuMDt1cz0wO2k9MDtsPTA7YT0w
>> >>X-Message-Info:
>> >>+ECsOKemykfesWAtthZo51NjGIlkWNfMUOBmTAlOkjINqLYWQikG3daceZ2XML8RJZgFdv
>> >>+Z
>> >>+yX7QsNVqkkhgxgLtO1cJS9wuQ
>> >>References: <5B2A3A856C3241C9AD9958C4B8D8F434@Julkun>
>> >><061901c7dda5$a94b1180$1578010a@amer.cisco.com>
>> >>X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480
>> >>X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match [from julio\.carrasco@ya\.com] (2007/08/13
>> >>08:48:46)
>> >>X-Loop: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >>X-Sequence: 19951
>> >>Errors-to: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
>> >>Precedence: bulk
>> >>X-no-archive: yes
>> >>List-Id: <ccielab.groupstudy.com>
>> >>List-Help: <mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=help>
>> >>List-Subscribe:
>> >><mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=subscribe%20ccielab>
>> >>List-Unsubscribe:
>> >><mailto:sympa@groupstudy.com?subject=unsubscribe%20ccielab>
>> >>List-Post: <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >>List-Owner: <mailto:ccielab-request@groupstudy.com>
>> >>Return-Path: ccielab-owner@groupstudy.com
>> >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2007 13:02:39.0972 (UTC)
>> >>FILETIME=[3A8B1240:01C7DDAA]
>> >>
>> >>I tried first with "distance 109 150.3.1.1 0.0.0.0" that is the OSPF
>> >>router Id of the router that injected the router, and didn4t work also.
>> >>
>> >>Thanks,
>> >>Julio.
>> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Morris"
>> >><smorris@ipexpert.com>
>> >>To: "'Julio Carrasco'" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>;
>> >><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>> >>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:29 PM
>> >>Subject: RE: OSPF Issue with Distance
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>With OSPF, the "139.3.15.1 0.0.0.0" portion of the distance command
>> >>>references who injected these LSAs into the area. Check out your
>> >>>"show ip ospf database" for those two routes and make sure they match
>> >>>the router id of that device.
>> >>>
>> >>>Who you see as next hop is not necessarily who brought the routes
>> >>>into the area.
>> >>>
>> >>>HTH,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>> >>>JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.
>> >>>CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
>> >>>VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
>> >>>IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>> >>>
>> >>>A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>> >>>
>> >>>smorris@ipexpert.com
>> >>>
>> >>>Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> >>>Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>> >>>http://www.ipexpert.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>-----Original Message-----
>> >>>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
>> >>>Of Julio Carrasco
>> >>>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 8:24 AM
>> >>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >>>Subject: OSPF Issue with Distance
>> >>>
>> >>>Hi Group,
>> >>>
>> >>>I am trying to configure r5 to change the ospf distnce for some
>> >>>routes learnt from router 1 (139.3.15.1) to 109.
>> >>>The config I have is:
>> >>>
>> >>>router ospf 1
>> >>>log-adjacency-changes
>> >>>redistribute rip subnets
>> >>>network 139.3.15.5 0.0.0.0 area 1
>> >>>neighbor 139.3.15.2
>> >>>neighbor 139.3.15.1
>> >>>distance 109 139.3.15.1 0.0.0.0 OSPF
>> >>>!
>> >>>ip access-list standard OSPF
>> >>>permit 139.3.2.0 0.0.0.255
>> >>>permit 139.3.6.0 0.0.0.255
>> >>>permit 139.3.7.0 0.0.0.255
>> >>>permit 139.3.11.0 0.0.0.255
>> >>>permit 139.3.0.0 0.0.0.255
>> >>>!
>> >>>
>> >>>but When i do a show ip route, I have this:
>> >>>
>> >>>O IA 139.3.6.0 [110/130] via 139.3.15.2, 00:30:47, Serial0/0/0
>> >>> [110/130] via 139.3.15.1, 00:30:47, Serial0/0/0
>> >>>O IA 139.3.7.0 [110/130] via 139.3.15.2, 00:30:47, Serial0/0/0
>> >>> [110/130] via 139.3.15.1, 00:30:47, Serial0/0/0
>> >>>
>> >>>Do anyone know why networks 139.3.6.0 and 139.3.7.0 remains with
>> >>>distance 110 ??
>> >>>
>> >>>I am sure, I am missing something or I am doing something stupid, fut
>> >>>I can4t find out what is.
>> >>>
>> >>>TIA,
>> >>>Julio.
>> >>>
>> >>>_____________________________________________________________________
>> >>>_ _ Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>______________________________________________________________________
>> >>_ Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > Put Your Face In Your Space with Windows Live Spaces
>> > http://spaces.live.com/?mkt=en-ca
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> CCSI# 30832
> www.Net-WorkBooks.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART