Re: Q on interface command point-to-point ...

From: slevin kremera (slevin.kremera@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2007 - 00:21:09 ART


once u declare int s1/0.1 point-to-point after that even if u just type int
ser1/0.1 it does not make any big difference becos it is already declared
point-point

On 8/15/07, ccie1101 <ccie1101@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This might be a real silly question but better to ask then not ask
> ...
>
> Here is my q ....
>
> 1) Is there any difference in doing Case 1 and Case 2 ? Both ways work but
> just wondering if there is any subtle difference if I dont do it as in
> Case
> 1 ? The difference that I am referring to is that do we need to explicitly
> call the interface 'int s1/0.1 point-to-point' or would it be okay just
> to call it 'int s1/0.1' ?
>
>
> *Case 1*
> int s1/0.1 point-to-point
> ip pim spare-mode
>
> OR
>
> *Case 2*
> int s1/0.1
> ip pim spare-mode
>
> Pls advice,
>
> Cheers,
>
> ccie1101
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART