From: ccie1101 (ccie1101@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2007 - 01:04:15 ART
Thanks Selvin and Joe .... :)
Cheers mates,
ccie1101.
On 8/15/07, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
>
> That's correct.. but if you are sending this snippet to your boss, its
>
> ip pim sparse-mode
>
> You forgot the "S" superman!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> slevin kremera
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:21 PM
> To: ccie1101
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Q on interface command point-to-point ...
>
> once u declare int s1/0.1 point-to-point after that even if u just type
> int
> ser1/0.1 it does not make any big difference becos it is already declared
> point-point
>
> On 8/15/07, ccie1101 <ccie1101@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > This might be a real silly question but better to ask then not ask
> > ...
> >
> > Here is my q ....
> >
> > 1) Is there any difference in doing Case 1 and Case 2 ? Both ways work
> but
> > just wondering if there is any subtle difference if I dont do it as in
> > Case
> > 1 ? The difference that I am referring to is that do we need to
> explicitly
> > call the interface 'int s1/0.1 point-to-point' or would it be okay
> just
> > to call it 'int s1/0.1' ?
> >
> >
> > *Case 1*
> > int s1/0.1 point-to-point
> > ip pim spare-mode
> >
> > OR
> >
> > *Case 2*
> > int s1/0.1
> > ip pim spare-mode
> >
> > Pls advice,
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > ccie1101
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART