From: slevin kremera (slevin.kremera@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 13 2007 - 22:11:18 ART
using physical interface ,i can basically do no frame-rely inverse arp ip
DLCI?
but is it beocs the question says dont use frame relay inverse arp that
multipoint was used?but even in that case he has added all the dlcs's that
are not part of the diagram
On 8/14/07, NITIN NITIN <ccie_study_123@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Coz Q says
>
> use PHYSICAL int
> dont use no frame inver arp ip commnad
> and learn dynamically
>
>
> using physical you learn other dlci except those you want
> soblack hole those DLCI on multipoint interface ( that not reqiored)
> Please let me know if still issues
>
> Regards
>
>
> *slevin kremera <slevin.kremera@gmail.com>* wrote:
>
> i dont understand why did they make it multipoint....it was easy with full
> frame-relay interface
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48255/*http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/_ylc=X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsYXJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?link=list&sid=396545433>from
> someone who knows.
> Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART