Re: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation

From: Herbert Maosa (asawilunda@googlemail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2007 - 19:02:51 ART


For back to back yes, for hybrid the must match. At least according to
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk713/tk237/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094a3c.shtml

Herbert.

On 8/10/07, CCIE 19999 <ccie@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
>
> Herbert,
>
> Even if the DLCI's does not match on both the ends, you can configure
> frame-
> relay local-dlci command and it will work. See below:
>
>
> R2(config-if)#
> interface Serial0/1
> ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no keepalive
> no dce-terminal-timing-enable
> frame-relay map ip 10.10.10.5 205
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay local-dlci 502
> end
>
> R2(config-if)#do sh fram map
> Serial0/1 (up): ip 10.10.10.5 dlci 205(0xCD,0x30D0), static,
> CISCO
> R2(config-if)#do ping 10.10.10.5
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.10.5, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/30/32 ms
>
>
> R5(config-if)#
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 10.10.10.5 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no keepalive
> clock rate 64000
> no dce-terminal-timing-enable
> frame-relay map ip 10.10.10.2 502
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay local-dlci 205
> end
>
> R5(config-if)#do sh fram map
> Serial0/0 (up): ip 10.10.10.2 dlci 502(0x1F6,0x7C60), static,
> CISCO
> R5(config-if)#do ping 10.10.10.2
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.10.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/29/32 ms
>
>
> HTH
> Shine
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Herbert Maosa
> Sent: Saturday, 11 August 2007 12:38 AM
> To: tom sun
> Cc: Antonio Soares; Gadad, Milind; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
>
> You can configure back to back frame-relay between routers. You DO NOT
> have
> to configure Frame-Relay Switching at all on any one of the routers. You
> just need to remember to set one side as Frame-relay intf-typ dce and the
> other as frame-relay intf-fype dte. also set your layer one clock rates.
>
> The only caveat with back to back frame relay is that the DLCI numbers on
> both sides MUST MATCH.
>
> I have done this so many times.
>
> Herbert.
>
>
> On 8/10/07, tom sun <tomsun2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > i think ,if 2 routers use back-to-back mode to connect themselves .it
> > does
> > not support frame-relay encapsulation ,maybe you can select hdlc or ppp
> > !!!
> >
> >
> > On 8/9/07, Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have here a working config. I used dynamips:
> > >
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > R1:
> > > !
> > > interface MFR12
> > > no ip address
> > > frame-relay intf-type dce
> > > !
> > > interface MFR12.1 point-to-point
> > > ip address 12.12.12.1 255.255.255.0
> > > frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> > > !
> > > interface Serial1/0
> > > no ip address
> > > encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> > > serial restart-delay 0
> > > no arp frame-relay
> > > !
> > > interface Serial1/1
> > > no ip address
> > > encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> > > serial restart-delay 0
> > > no arp frame-relay
> > > !
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > R2:
> > > !
> > > interface MFR12
> > > no ip address
> > > !
> > > interface MFR12.1 point-to-point
> > > ip address 12.12.12.2 255.255.255.0
> > > frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> > > !
> > > interface Serial1/0
> > > no ip address
> > > encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> > > serial restart-delay 0
> > > no arp frame-relay
> > > !
> > > interface Serial1/1
> > > no ip address
> > > encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> > > serial restart-delay 0
> > > no arp frame-relay
> > > !
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > R1#
> > > R1#ping 12.12.12.2
> > >
> > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 12.12.12.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > > !!!!!
> > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 92/122/192
> > ms
> > > R1#
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > R1#sh frame multi
> > > Bundle: MFR12, State = up, class = A, fragmentation disabled
> > > BID = MFR12
> > > Bundle links:
> > > Serial1/1, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Serial1/1
> > > Serial1/0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Serial1/0
> > >
> > > R1#
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Antonio Soares
> > > CCIE #18473, CCNP, CCIP
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Gadad, Milind
> > > Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de Agosto de 2007 18:05
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
> > >
> > > Can we connect 2 routers back to back with frame-relay encapsulation?
> I
> > > don't have a frame-rely switch in between the two routers.
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kindest regards,
> hm
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>

-- 
Kindest regards,
hm


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART