From: Herbert Maosa (asawilunda@googlemail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2007 - 15:29:38 ART
Hi Bob,
You are right, I combined two properties from the different
implementations. In back to back we do not need to set intf-type dce .
Herbert.
On 8/10/07, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net> wrote:
>
> Herbert Maosa wrote:
> > You can configure back to back frame-relay between routers. You DO NOT
> have
> > to configure Frame-Relay Switching at all on any one of the routers. You
> > just need to remember to set one side as Frame-relay intf-typ dce and
> the
> > other as frame-relay intf-fype dte. also set your layer one clock rates.
> >
> Herbert,
>
> What IOS are using that allows you to set the interface type to dce
> without enablling frame-relay switching? Here is the result I get:
>
> R5(config)#int s1/0
> R5(config-if)#no shut
> R5(config-if)#encap frame
> R5(config-if)#frame intf-type dce
> Must enable frame-relay switching to configure DCE/NNI
> R5(config-if)#
>
>
> As I am sure you know, there are two methods that permit frame
> encapsulation between two routers without an intermediate frame switch:
>
> One is called "back-to-back". It does not require frame-switching or an
> interface set to type dce. It is can be found on CCO at document ID:
> 14193.
>
> The other is "hybrid switching" It does require frame-switching on one
> side and one interface of frame-relay type dce. It can be found on CCO
> at document ID: 14194.
>
> Did I misunderstand your comment above, or am I missing something?
>
>
> --
>
>
> Bob Sinclair CCIE 10427 CCSI 30427
> www.netmasterclass.net
>
-- Kindest regards, hm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART