From: tom sun (tomsun2007@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2007 - 04:12:46 ART
hi all
i forget to use command :no keepalive:,you are right !
thanks all
On 8/10/07, CCIE 19999 <ccie@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> What are you trying to say? If two routers are connected back to back over
> serial ports, the encapsulation cannot be frame relay? If this is what you
> are saying, it's wrong.
>
> You can connect 2 routers back to back and use the frame relay
> encapsulation
> as the sample config provided by Bit will work.
>
> I suppose, the config you have pasted does have the 'no keepalive' command
> missing.
>
> My 2c,
> Shine
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> tom
> sun
> Sent: Friday, 10 August 2007 4:25 PM
> To: Bit Gossip
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
>
> hi,gossip
>
> if you want to use frame-relay encapsulation ,between both routers
> must
> be frame-relay switch !!because frame routed in frame-relay switch,routers
> must learn dlci from frame-relay switch !
>
>
> R1#show run int s1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 76 bytes
> !
> interface Serial1
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> clockrate 64000
>
> R2#show run int s1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 59 bytes
> !
> interface Serial1
> ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> end
>
> R2#
>
> R1#ping 1.1.1.2
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 32/32/32 ms
>
> R1#show run int s1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 173 bytes
> !
> interface Serial1
> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> clockrate 64000
> frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.2 555 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> end
>
> Serial1 (up): ip 1.1.1.2 dlci 555(0x22B,0x88B0), static,
> broadcast,
> CISCO, status deleted
>
> R2#show run int s1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 156 bytes
> !
> interface Serial1
> ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.1 555 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> end
> R2#show frame-relay map
> Serial1 (up): ip 1.1.1.1 dlci 555(0x22B,0x88B0), static,
> broadcast,
> CISCO, status deleted
> above config ,first i use dhlc to encapsulation ,confirm my netwok it ok
> .,then change to frame-relay encapsulation !!!!!
>
> On 8/9/07, Bit Gossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tom,
> > back-to-back frame-relay in the simplest possible form:
> >
> > R4#show running-config int s0/1
> > Building configuration...
> >
> > Current configuration : 180 bytes
> > !
> > interface Serial0/1
> > ip address 155.55.55.4 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no keepalive
> > frame-relay map ip 155.55.55.5 555 broadcast
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > end
> >
> > R5#show frame-relay map
> > Serial0/1 (up): ip 155.55.55.4 dlci 555(0x22B,0x88B0), static,
> > broadcast,
> > CISCO
> > R5#show run int s0/1
> > Building configuration...
> >
> > Current configuration : 199 bytes
> > !
> > interface Serial0/1
> > ip address 155.55.55.5 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no keepalive
> > clock rate 128000
> > frame-relay map ip 155.55.55.4 555 broadcast
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > end
> >
> > R5#ping 155.55.55.4
> >
> > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 155.55.55.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > !!!!!
> > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "tom sun" <tomsun2007@gmail.com>
> > To: "Antonio Soares" <amsoares@netcabo.pt>
> > Cc: "Gadad, Milind" <m-gadad1@ti.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 6:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
> >
> >
> > >i think ,if 2 routers use back-to-back mode to connect themselves .it
> > does
> > > not support frame-relay encapsulation ,maybe you can select hdlc or
> ppp
> > > !!!
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/9/07, Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I have here a working config. I used dynamips:
> > >>
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> R1:
> > >> !
> > >> interface MFR12
> > >> no ip address
> > >> frame-relay intf-type dce
> > >> !
> > >> interface MFR12.1 point-to-point
> > >> ip address 12.12.12.1 255.255.255.0
> > >> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> > >> !
> > >> interface Serial1/0
> > >> no ip address
> > >> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> > >> serial restart-delay 0
> > >> no arp frame-relay
> > >> !
> > >> interface Serial1/1
> > >> no ip address
> > >> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> > >> serial restart-delay 0
> > >> no arp frame-relay
> > >> !
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> R2:
> > >> !
> > >> interface MFR12
> > >> no ip address
> > >> !
> > >> interface MFR12.1 point-to-point
> > >> ip address 12.12.12.2 255.255.255.0
> > >> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> > >> !
> > >> interface Serial1/0
> > >> no ip address
> > >> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> > >> serial restart-delay 0
> > >> no arp frame-relay
> > >> !
> > >> interface Serial1/1
> > >> no ip address
> > >> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> > >> serial restart-delay 0
> > >> no arp frame-relay
> > >> !
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> R1#
> > >> R1#ping 12.12.12.2
> > >>
> > >> Type escape sequence to abort.
> > >> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 12.12.12.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > >> !!!!!
> > >> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max =
> 92/122/192
> > ms
> > >> R1#
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> R1#sh frame multi
> > >> Bundle: MFR12, State = up, class = A, fragmentation disabled
> > >> BID = MFR12
> > >> Bundle links:
> > >> Serial1/1, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Serial1/1
> > >> Serial1/0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Serial1/0
> > >>
> > >> R1#
> > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Antonio Soares
> > >> CCIE #18473, CCNP, CCIP
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > >> Gadad, Milind
> > >> Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de Agosto de 2007 18:05
> > >> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >> Subject: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
> > >>
> > >> Can we connect 2 routers back to back with frame-relay encapsulation?
> I
> > >> don't have a frame-rely switch in between the two routers.
> > >>
> > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART