From: tom sun (tomsun2007@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2007 - 03:25:08 ART
hi,gossip
if you want to use frame-relay encapsulation ,between both routers must
be frame-relay switch !!because frame routed in frame-relay switch,routers
must learn dlci from frame-relay switch !
R1#show run int s1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 76 bytes
!
interface Serial1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
clockrate 64000
R2#show run int s1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 59 bytes
!
interface Serial1
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
end
R2#
R1#ping 1.1.1.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 32/32/32 ms
R1#show run int s1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 173 bytes
!
interface Serial1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
clockrate 64000
frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.2 555 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
end
Serial1 (up): ip 1.1.1.2 dlci 555(0x22B,0x88B0), static,
broadcast,
CISCO, status deleted
R2#show run int s1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 156 bytes
!
interface Serial1
ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.1 555 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
end
R2#show frame-relay map
Serial1 (up): ip 1.1.1.1 dlci 555(0x22B,0x88B0), static,
broadcast,
CISCO, status deleted
above config ,first i use dhlc to encapsulation ,confirm my netwok it ok
.,then change to frame-relay encapsulation !!!!!
On 8/9/07, Bit Gossip <bit.gossip@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
> back-to-back frame-relay in the simplest possible form:
>
> R4#show running-config int s0/1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 180 bytes
> !
> interface Serial0/1
> ip address 155.55.55.4 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no keepalive
> frame-relay map ip 155.55.55.5 555 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> end
>
> R5#show frame-relay map
> Serial0/1 (up): ip 155.55.55.4 dlci 555(0x22B,0x88B0), static,
> broadcast,
> CISCO
> R5#show run int s0/1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 199 bytes
> !
> interface Serial0/1
> ip address 155.55.55.5 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no keepalive
> clock rate 128000
> frame-relay map ip 155.55.55.4 555 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> end
>
> R5#ping 155.55.55.4
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 155.55.55.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tom sun" <tomsun2007@gmail.com>
> To: "Antonio Soares" <amsoares@netcabo.pt>
> Cc: "Gadad, Milind" <m-gadad1@ti.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 6:00 AM
> Subject: Re: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
>
>
> >i think ,if 2 routers use back-to-back mode to connect themselves .it
> does
> > not support frame-relay encapsulation ,maybe you can select hdlc or ppp
> > !!!
> >
> >
> > On 8/9/07, Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have here a working config. I used dynamips:
> >>
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> R1:
> >> !
> >> interface MFR12
> >> no ip address
> >> frame-relay intf-type dce
> >> !
> >> interface MFR12.1 point-to-point
> >> ip address 12.12.12.1 255.255.255.0
> >> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> >> !
> >> interface Serial1/0
> >> no ip address
> >> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> >> serial restart-delay 0
> >> no arp frame-relay
> >> !
> >> interface Serial1/1
> >> no ip address
> >> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> >> serial restart-delay 0
> >> no arp frame-relay
> >> !
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> R2:
> >> !
> >> interface MFR12
> >> no ip address
> >> !
> >> interface MFR12.1 point-to-point
> >> ip address 12.12.12.2 255.255.255.0
> >> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
> >> !
> >> interface Serial1/0
> >> no ip address
> >> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> >> serial restart-delay 0
> >> no arp frame-relay
> >> !
> >> interface Serial1/1
> >> no ip address
> >> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
> >> serial restart-delay 0
> >> no arp frame-relay
> >> !
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> R1#
> >> R1#ping 12.12.12.2
> >>
> >> Type escape sequence to abort.
> >> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 12.12.12.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
> >> !!!!!
> >> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 92/122/192
> ms
> >> R1#
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> R1#sh frame multi
> >> Bundle: MFR12, State = up, class = A, fragmentation disabled
> >> BID = MFR12
> >> Bundle links:
> >> Serial1/1, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Serial1/1
> >> Serial1/0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Serial1/0
> >>
> >> R1#
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Antonio Soares
> >> CCIE #18473, CCNP, CCIP
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Gadad, Milind
> >> Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de Agosto de 2007 18:05
> >> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> Subject: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
> >>
> >> Can we connect 2 routers back to back with frame-relay encapsulation? I
> >> don't have a frame-rely switch in between the two routers.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART