From: Bit Gossip (bit.gossip@chello.nl)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2007 - 00:54:37 ART
Hi Tom,
back-to-back frame-relay in the simplest possible form:
R4#show running-config int s0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 180 bytes
!
interface Serial0/1
ip address 155.55.55.4 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no keepalive
frame-relay map ip 155.55.55.5 555 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
end
R5#show frame-relay map
Serial0/1 (up): ip 155.55.55.4 dlci 555(0x22B,0x88B0), static,
broadcast,
CISCO
R5#show run int s0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 199 bytes
!
interface Serial0/1
ip address 155.55.55.5 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
no keepalive
clock rate 128000
frame-relay map ip 155.55.55.4 555 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
end
R5#ping 155.55.55.4
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 155.55.55.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1
----- Original Message -----
From: "tom sun" <tomsun2007@gmail.com>
To: "Antonio Soares" <amsoares@netcabo.pt>
Cc: "Gadad, Milind" <m-gadad1@ti.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 6:00 AM
Subject: Re: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
>i think ,if 2 routers use back-to-back mode to connect themselves .it does
> not support frame-relay encapsulation ,maybe you can select hdlc or ppp
> !!!
>
>
> On 8/9/07, Antonio Soares <amsoares@netcabo.pt> wrote:
>>
>> I have here a working config. I used dynamips:
>>
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> R1:
>> !
>> interface MFR12
>> no ip address
>> frame-relay intf-type dce
>> !
>> interface MFR12.1 point-to-point
>> ip address 12.12.12.1 255.255.255.0
>> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
>> !
>> interface Serial1/0
>> no ip address
>> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
>> serial restart-delay 0
>> no arp frame-relay
>> !
>> interface Serial1/1
>> no ip address
>> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
>> serial restart-delay 0
>> no arp frame-relay
>> !
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> R2:
>> !
>> interface MFR12
>> no ip address
>> !
>> interface MFR12.1 point-to-point
>> ip address 12.12.12.2 255.255.255.0
>> frame-relay interface-dlci 102
>> !
>> interface Serial1/0
>> no ip address
>> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
>> serial restart-delay 0
>> no arp frame-relay
>> !
>> interface Serial1/1
>> no ip address
>> encapsulation frame-relay MFR12
>> serial restart-delay 0
>> no arp frame-relay
>> !
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> R1#
>> R1#ping 12.12.12.2
>>
>> Type escape sequence to abort.
>> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 12.12.12.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
>> !!!!!
>> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 92/122/192 ms
>> R1#
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> R1#sh frame multi
>> Bundle: MFR12, State = up, class = A, fragmentation disabled
>> BID = MFR12
>> Bundle links:
>> Serial1/1, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Serial1/1
>> Serial1/0, HW state = up, link state = Up, LID = Serial1/0
>>
>> R1#
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Antonio Soares
>> CCIE #18473, CCNP, CCIP
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Gadad, Milind
>> Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de Agosto de 2007 18:05
>> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Subject: MFR interface - frame-relay encapsulation
>>
>> Can we connect 2 routers back to back with frame-relay encapsulation? I
>> don't have a frame-rely switch in between the two routers.
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:10 ART