From: Marc La Porte (marc.a.laporte@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Aug 02 2007 - 13:17:24 ART
Hi,
If you look at the diagram, there is only 1 OSPF area in total, so the area
number doesn't really matter. If you would have multiple areas then one of
them should be area 0 all all other areas should be connected to it (either
directly or via virtual links or gre tunnels etc)
Cheers,
Marc
On 8/2/07, ISolveSystems <support@isolvesystems.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Experts,
> 3.1 OSPF - The is no mention of area 0 at all. I thought area 0 is always
> required. Have any one run into any issue with it?
>
> 3.10 Network Migration - At this point, there is no redistribution, yet.
> How
> does R3 in the RIP network know how to get to 148.1.68.0 in the OSPF
> network? This is being shown in the Task 3.10 verification of the solution
> guide.
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:09 ART