From: brajesh.thakur@wipro.com
Date: Wed Aug 01 2007 - 07:48:44 ART
Thanks for the clarification mate, I missed this small detail. I was
trying to relate it to underlying layer 2 technology.
Warm Regards,
Brajesh Thakur
________________________________
From: Ben [mailto:bmunyao@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:09 PM
To: Brajesh Thakur (WI01 - Services)
Cc: bdennis@internetworkexpert.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IEWB Lab16 Task 4.1
Hi Brajesh,
IMO it has to do with the requirements of task 3.2, where you make R3
take the link bandwidths into account. R3--R4 is 1024K, R3--R5 is 512K.
When this is done, you'll find that R3 prefers to use the R3--R4 path to
get to R5, hence multi hopping. I could be missing something of course.
HTH
Ben
On 8/1/07, brajesh.thakur@wipro.com < brajesh.thakur@wipro.com
<mailto:brajesh.thakur@wipro.com> > wrote:
Brian, Can you please clarify why do We need to enable ebgp-multihop
between router3 and router5 in this task
Warm Regards,
Brajesh Thakur
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate,
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and
destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this email.
www.wipro.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:09 ART