From: CCIE 19999 (ccie@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Wed Aug 01 2007 - 03:55:24 ART
Lim,
I was just curious if I could override the connected prefix with a
distributed one. I was going though one of the workbooks and I
misinterpreted (:-)) the scenario. I couldn't get a proper explanation in
the solution guide.
I don't think it is possible to override the AD of the connected or make the
prefix appear as an external one.
Regards,
Shine
_____
From: Toh Soon, Lim [mailto:tohsoon28@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2007 1:51 PM
To: CCIE 19999
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Connected interface appear as External
Hi Shine,
Just curious, what's the practicality of modifying the AD of a connected
route (AD=0) to some higher value (in your example, AD of external EIGRP,
i.e. 170)? Do you encounter this requirement in your lab workbooks or
elsewhere?
I'm kinda confused. Please clarify.
Thank you.
B.Rgds,
Lim TS
On 7/31/07, CCIE 19999 <ccie@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
Hi Folks,
Is there a way actually you can make a connected prefix appear as external?
For example, 151.10.1.2 is a connected interface on R1 and the routing
protocol is EIGRP.
I am wondering if it is possible to make the prefix appear as D EX in router
R1 instead of as Connected.
TIA,
Shine
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:09 ART